Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Bell Canada Must Prove Congestion Claims » If only 5% generate 60% of the total traffic...
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Why isn't this a class action breach of contract suit? »
« Mississagua  
reelbigfish

join:2002-06-06
Boston, MA

Re: If only 5% generate 60% of the total traffic...

It is dedicated up to the DSLAM at which point it is aggregated and from then on out the bandwidth is shared. It is the nature of the internet, somewhere you have to share bandwidth. With cable it is at the node, DSL at the DSLAM.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Re: If only 5% generate 60% of the total traffic...

But my understanding is there is more total throughput available to the DSLAM than equivalent channel capacity to a node, meaning that it's harder for a few users to hammer an entire DSLAM while a few users can saturate cable upstream channels.
dynodb
Premium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN

Re: If only 5% generate 60% of the total traffic...

Even if the DSLAM isn't congested (and this can also happen), the ISP trunks and trunks between it and the DSLAM can be.

Yeah, yeah- I know. 'Just add more bandwidth' is always the standard reply here, but doing so is neither easy or cheap.
HoserMcMoose

join:2003-07-26
Kitchener, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..

Re: If only 5% generate 60% of the total traffic...

said by dynodb See Profile :

Yeah, yeah- I know. 'Just add more bandwidth' is always the standard reply here, but doing so is neither easy or cheap.
If they don't want to add the capacity then they should SELL that capacity.

If I were to buy a dozen eggs from you and paid full price for them, I would be pretty ticked off if you gave me only 8 eggs because you didn't have enough chickens to fill demand.

Bell is selling bandwidth to their wholesale ISPs at a fixed rate with NO provision in the contract to arbitrarily limit that bandwidth, but they are doing just that. They are in blatant violation of their contract and if the CAIP fails with their CRTC appeal they can probably win against Bell is contract court.

Unfortunately the latter would likely take 3+ years to go through
Forums » Bell Canada Must Prove Congestion ClaimsWhy isn't this a class action breach of contract suit? »
« Mississagua  


Saturday, 05-Dec 03:36:41 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [89] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· Sun Releases Update 17 for Java SE 6 [Security]