[H/W] "sh int" on an OC3 interface shows aborts in Cisco http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20506000 en Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:32:36 EDT Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:32:36 EDT Re: [H/W] "sh int" on an OC3 interface shows aborts http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20509909 TomS_ :
said by Da Geek Kid See Profile :

d-mark
You mean demarc. Its short for "demarcation".

But I wouldnt neccessarily replace the cable, sometimes all it takes is to clean the ends (note: with a fibre cleaning kit!), particularly if the environment the service is installed in can be a little dusty.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20509909 Tue, 20 May 2008 00:56:11 EDT Re: [H/W] "sh int" on an OC3 interface shows aborts http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20509338 Da Geek Kid : as aryoba See Profile said I would replace the cable to the d-mark as well..]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20509338 Mon, 19 May 2008 22:34:03 EDT Re: [H/W] "sh int" on an OC3 interface shows aborts http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20506989 aryoba :
said by phatrabt See Profile :

We're using a Cisco 7304 with an OC3 card installed (7300-2OC3ATM-SMI) running IOS 12.2(20)S10 for remote site connectivity. On the active OC3 (atm3/0) interface (containing 312 sub-interfaces) I am seeing a trickle of CRC errors accumulate but the number of aborts is increasing at a large rate. Do the aborts signify it sees a physical layer issue?
It sounds like physical layer issue. Call your ISP or telco to do some loop testing.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20506989 Mon, 19 May 2008 15:20:59 EDT [H/W] "sh int" on an OC3 interface shows aborts http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20506000 phatrabt : We're using a Cisco 7304 with an OC3 card installed (7300-2OC3ATM-SMI) running IOS 12.2(20)S10 for remote site connectivity. On the active OC3 (atm3/0) interface (containing 312 sub-interfaces) I am seeing a trickle of CRC errors accumulate but the number of aborts is increasing at a large rate. I have researched the aborts and can't find a good answer of what they are so I was hoping someone had an answer. Do the aborts signify it sees a physical layer issue? Or a higher layer issue? Any help would be appreciated!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20506000 Mon, 19 May 2008 12:01:13 EDT