Which actually means nothing. -

Author	All Replies
davidbrown join:2005-05-31 Toronto, ON	Which actually means nothing. Yeah they have been asked but there is nothing from preventing them from pulling the numbers out of their collective ass. They are going to spin the numbers for the crtc just like they do for everyone else and there is no way for the crtc to prove that they are fake. There is no big brother watching these guys to make sure they don't pull this shit so they do it routinely.
davidbrown join:2005-05-31 Toronto, ON	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-19 12:56:16 ·
globus999 join:2008-05-15	said by davidbrown: Yeah they have been asked but there is nothing from preventing them from pulling the numbers out of their collective ass. They are going to spin the numbers for the crtc just like they do for everyone else and there is no way for the crtc to prove that they are fake. There is no big brother watching these guys to make sure they don't pull this shit so they do it routinely. BINGO! At least somebody doing a proper "reversing" of CRTC's attitude. Let me go one further. I think is it all for publich show. Bell was asked to provide "evidence" which they will "provide". CAIP has NOT been asked to provide rebuttal proof... What a shame.... Then, the CRTC takes Bell cooked numbers at face value and PRESTO! democracy in action! your tax dollars at work! Bell is right and you are screwed!!! I think we are all being SET-UP!!!
globus999 join:2008-05-15	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-19 14:57:36 ·
DanNCF @teksavvy.com	reply to davidbrown Well lets use there math on a HD DVD Movie download... 2Gig as per our Lemming friend Jason Laszlo and friends at Bell LOL. They sure know their stuff hehehe
DanNCF @teksavvy.com	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-19 16:58:39 ·

Bell Canada Must Prove Congestion Claims > Which actually means nothing.

Which actually means nothing.