site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
202
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Terence

join:2003-11-26
Toronto, ON

What's preventing Bell from purposely creating congestion?!

If there is any congestion in the near future, it's because Bell is not putting enough resource into upgrading their network.

CRTC should also ask Bell to prove that they have reinvested a significant amount (50%+) of revenue from the wholesale ISPs ($21/subscriber + cost of Gig-E links) into building the network, excluding remotes and other equipments that are not available to the wholesalers.


Maynard G Krebs

@teksavvy.com

said by Terence:

If there is any congestion in the near future, it's because Bell is not putting enough resource into upgrading their network.

CRTC should also ask Bell to prove that they have reinvested a significant amount (50%+) of revenue from the wholesale ISPs ($21/subscriber + cost of Gig-E links) into building the network, excluding remotes and other equipments that are not available to the wholesalers.
I wonder what the incremental cost of pulling additional dark fiber is between the local CO and the NAP is. Sure it will be the raw cost of the extra fiber, but how much more because they are pulling say 4 fibers instead of one?

Bell should also be made to break out the alleged 'overloading' by CO and NAP. This will allow the CRTC and CAIP to understand where the pressure points Bell thinks is has are located.

Bell should also be required to provide a detailed equipment list on the Gig-E links and anything else that sucks bandwidth that they've installed on those links so that any bandwidth issues arising from obsolete equipment or Bell 'leeching' can be identified and dealt with.

Wednesday, 30-May 08:37:02 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics