<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>7 Years for all of NYC? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20512355</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:52:34 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:52:34 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 7 Years for all of NYC?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20512387</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/939879"><b>openbox9</b></A> : I find it ironic that some believe 7 years to wire a city is good, but other believe ISPs aren't doing their jobs if they don't wire the whole country in less than a year.<br><br> Matt <A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>, not directed at you, just tagging along with your comment.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20512387</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:24:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>7 Years for all of NYC?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20512355</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : 7 years is a good number if Verizon can actually meet it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20512355</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:19:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
