Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Interested In Pretending You Have Influence On Verizon/NYC Deal? » 679 million dollar contract
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Here's How The Fines SHOULD HAVE Read.... »
« Have to dump on Verizon - it is mandatory  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southwest

reply to SD6
Re: 679 million dollar contract

said by SD6 See Profile :

I sometimes wonder whether the intention is to tie news themes together or to create themes. Using the size of an unrelated government contract to support criticism of the size of the penalties in the NYC FIOS agreement is not appropriate. This website is valuable to me as an aggregator of broadband related news. I can deal with the various editorial slants.
I'm not sure what website you're reading, but dslreports and its readership has been accused of being OVERLY supportive of Verizon, with its long-term business plan and use of future-proof technology.

Pointing out that VZ received a very large government contract is interesting both as VZ stockholder and citizen of this country. I was unaware of the news so I followed the link to learn more.

The financial penalties for Verizon for failing to meet FIOS rollout targets in NYC is 100% laughable. That amount of money is chump change, not the "large monetary penalities" you called it.


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Those penalties are a gift.
which are a pittance after all the lucrative areas are cherry picked. and the 30 million? written off as a biz loss.
typical big biz practices. * y a w n *
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Actually it's only been mentioned twice for scale, and I can use another metric if you'd like.

The amount made on just fees in the last month by the company nationally?
its mind boggling. specially the "my service sucks so i gotta pay $200 penalty to get off it" fee.
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee


Pathfinder
Dazed Confused
Premium
join:2000-03-26
Mount Vernon, NY
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode See Profile :

The scale of the penalties are even not remotely in line with the company's overall revenues. Verizon spends $4 million per quarter on lobbying alone. Those penalties are a gift.
And they shouldn't be. The company does business in many states and that state should be the gauge not the nation.

SD6

join:2005-03-26

reply to morbo
said by morbo See Profile :

said by MrSpock29 See Profile :

One has nothing at all to do with the other.
I disagree. News is news, and this website's purpose is to provide the news and tie together relevant themes that exist.
I sometimes wonder whether the intention is to tie news themes together or to create themes. Using the size of an unrelated government contract to support criticism of the size of the penalties in the NYC FIOS agreement is not appropriate. This website is valuable to me as an aggregator of broadband related news. I can deal with the various editorial slants.

The appropriate factors to judge the size of the penalties:
1) their proportion to the value of the franchise (to VZ)
2) the extent of competition to execute a similar franchise
3) the penalties in similar franchise agreements

I can only comment on 2) and 3) now. Not much competition because there are very few companies that could even hope to wire all of NYC for TV in six years (or even 10 years). Very few franchise agreements explicitly include large monetary penalties for failure to complete the buildout.

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ

reply to Shamayim
said by Shamayim See Profile :

I apologize. Apparently I misunderstood your comment.
No worries


Shamayim
I already have a Messiah.
Premium
join:2002-09-23
reply to MrSpock29
I apologize. Apparently I misunderstood your comment.

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ


1 edit
reply to Shamayim
said by Shamayim See Profile :

said by MrSpock29 See Profile :

This is supposed to be a capitalistic society.
Capitalism is the best economic system in the world. It is not a license to rip off the consumer.
Agreed. Not sure where I ever said it was a license to rip off people though.


Shamayim
I already have a Messiah.
Premium
join:2002-09-23


2 edits
reply to MrSpock29
said by MrSpock29 See Profile :

This is supposed to be a capitalistic society.
Capitalism is the best economic system in the world. It is not a license to rip off the consumer.
--
Who is Jesus? and Why it matters (to YOU).


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southwest

reply to MrSpock29
said by MrSpock29 See Profile :

One has nothing at all to do with the other.
I disagree. News is news, and this website's purpose is to provide the news and tie together relevant themes that exist.

EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA
reply to morbo
Probably the former MCI side of the business though, not the former NYNEX/Bell Atlantic division that's responsible for FiOS... Still the same parent company I guess though.

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ


1 edit
reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode See Profile :

quote:
I guess we are at a time where we look to heavily penalize companies for trying to do business.
Yes. Just to be mean. Good insight.
It was sarcasm.
Feel free to delete what you wish.


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
reply to MrSpock29
quote:
I guess we are at a time where we look to heavily penalize companies for trying to do business.
Yes. Just to be mean. Good insight.

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ

reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode See Profile :

The scale of the penalties are even not remotely in line with the company's overall revenues. Verizon spends $4 million per quarter on lobbying alone. Those penalties are a gift.
In your opinion. But I guess we are at a time where we look to heavily penalize companies for trying to do business. A 121 million dollar penalty is a 121 million dollar penalty. If they lost that big deal, should the penalties go down?


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to morbo
said by morbo See Profile :

it has to do with VERIZON, which is the company set to wire NYC. it's also a huge government contract, so it's good to know just for general information.
Yes, but that isn't WHY it was included.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ


1 edit
reply to morbo
said by morbo See Profile :

it has to do with VERIZON, which is the company set to wire NYC. it's also a huge government contract, so it's good to know just for general information.
A Federal contract has nothing to do with a contract for NYC at all, IMHO, it is irrelevant to the point.
It is similar to saying that "Comcast is deploying DOCSIS 3.0 in their markets, the same company who had an issue with a traffic accident......". One has nothing at all to do with the other.


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
reply to MrSpock29
The scale of the penalties are even not remotely in line with the company's overall revenues. Verizon spends $4 million per quarter on lobbying alone. Those penalties are a gift.


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
reply to MrSpock29
it has to do with VERIZON, which is the company set to wire NYC. it's also a huge government contract, so it's good to know just for general information.

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ

reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Actually it's only been mentioned twice for scale, and I can use another metric if you'd like.

The amount made on just fees in the last month by the company nationally?
Karl,

This is a slippery slope. Every company that tries to do business should have prior deals held against them?
What does it have to do with NYC?

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ

reply to morbo
said by morbo See Profile :

why do you think it isn't relevant?
What does it have to do with NYC? Nothing. Businesses go out and "do business". Because a company gets one contract totally unrelated, does that mean it should be held against them?
This is supposed to be a capitalistic society.
Forums » Interested In Pretending You Have Influence On Verizon/NYC Deal?Here's How The Fines SHOULD HAVE Read.... »
« Have to dump on Verizon - it is mandatory  
page: 1 · 2


Thursday, 03-Dec 00:03:58 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [95] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [79] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [39] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
· [38] Charter Exits Chapter 11
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Do I have a case for small claims court? [General Questions]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· Data Usage Meter Launched [Comcast HSI]
· Why was the "internet" light on my Belkin N+ blinking? [Wireless Networking]
· Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade [Security]
· [Scam] Is zwee.com a scam site? [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· DIR-655 New Beta 1.32b09 [D-Link]