  blah
@xspedius.net | Not an issue at all
Rain fade really is not an issue with Microwave links at all. I worked for a company for many years that used one and even under the most heavy rains we saw no issues at all. The link was about a 10-15mile distance too. |
|
  sporkme drop the crantini and move it, sister Premium,MVM join:2000-07-01 Morristown, NJ
·Optimum Online
| said by blah :
Rain fade really is not an issue with Microwave links at all. I worked for a company for many years that used one and even under the most heavy rains we saw no issues at all. The link was about a 10-15mile distance too. The piece sounds a bit FUD-infested. Unless this is some new, untested microwave technology, it doesn't really make sense. Well-engineered links should not have problems unless the signal is marginal to begin with. |
|
  en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to blah If I'm not mistaken, Bell Canada originally deployed microwave links across Canada for communications ~ 50 years ago.
»www.histori.ca/minutes/minute.do?id=10223 -- Canada = Hollywood North |
|
  Matt Take me down to the paradise city Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| reply to sporkme said by sporkme :said by blah :
Rain fade really is not an issue with Microwave links at all. I worked for a company for many years that used one and even under the most heavy rains we saw no issues at all. The link was about a 10-15mile distance too. The piece sounds a bit FUD-infested. Unless this is some new, untested microwave technology, it doesn't really make sense. Well-engineered links should not have problems unless the signal is marginal to begin with. I agree. I know of a local carrier that has a 30+ mile microwave link between Greensboro, NC and Asheboro, NC. I specifically asked about weather interference and he said it was non-existent unless the link was marginal to begin with. |
|
  rf_engineer
join:2003-08-04 USA
| reply to sporkme said by sporkme :said by blah :
Rain fade really is not an issue with Microwave links at all. I worked for a company for many years that used one and even under the most heavy rains we saw no issues at all. The link was about a 10-15mile distance too. The piece sounds a bit FUD-infested. Unless this is some new, untested microwave technology, it doesn't really make sense. Well-engineered links should not have problems unless the signal is marginal to begin with. I agree. Microwave has been around for a long, long time and is well proven. Here's a site that chronicles a lot of the old AT&T networks: »long-lines.net/ . Some ill-informed people like to think microwave is some new, risky technology but it's been around longer than several other broadband technologies.
Microwave links are engineered using one of a handful of propagation/rain models which predict the annual availability. Getting the desired availability, whether it's four nines, five nines, or more is merely determining the appropriate antenna gains, transmitter powers, path distances and a few other key factors.
The upcoming wireless backhaul bandwidth crunch is going to be handled largely by hybrid fiber and microwave networks. There's just no way fiber is going to be able to reach rural sites and copper-based T1s from LECs just aren't going to cut it anymore.
Proxim has been around awhile, but they're not the only company offering broadband microwave. Other companies such as Ericsson, NEC, Alcatel, Harris-Stratex, Dragonwave, and Ceragon, to name a few, all offer licensed microwave solutions that you'll likely see deployed for wireless backhaul. |
|
  tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09 Saint Clair Shores, MI
| reply to en102 Yeah.. and you can bet it rains/snows/fogs/birds poop in Canada..eh?  |
|
  en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | As a Canadian that lived north of Lake Superior for ~18 years, you see all kinds of weather. Not as many tornadoes as the U.S., but plenty of snow/rain/freezing rain/hail. -- Canada = Hollywood North |
|
  tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09 Saint Clair Shores, MI | Yep.. and we couldn't ask for a better neighbor..  |
|