 OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium join:2003-12-08 Birmingham, AL 1 edit | Symantec tells users: Disable protection before SP3... May 27, 2008 (Computerworld) Symantec Corp. has told users of its consumer security products that they should disable a feature in the software before upgrading to Windows XP Service Pack 3, or risk crippling their computers.
»www.computerworld.com/action/art···M&nlid=8 |
|
|
|
 jerry666Premium join:2002-12-12 Sainte-Anne-Des-Lacs, QC | symantec says others are having this problem . well I've updated 8 computers , 3 with AVG , 2 with avast 1 with trend 1 with avira and 1 with panda , none has had any problems and they were a mix of AMD and intel . norton went downhill years ago . |
|
 | reply to Oleg I guess I got lucky. I installed SP3 right over NIS2008. No glitches so far. |
|
 davePremium,MVM join:2000-05-04 not in ohio kudos:7 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to jerry666 "8 computers did not have the problem" is not particularly persuasive evidence against the truth of the proposition "some other computers have the problem".
I don't know whether Symantec is or os not completely to blame for this screwup; I'm just a fan of logic. |
|
 OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium join:2003-12-08 Birmingham, AL 2 edits | reply to Oleg What makes me wonder is why people think Norton is better than other security products? I would not want Norton even for free  |
|
 MagManLife is simpler when you tell the truth.Premium join:2003-10-01 Westlake, OH Reviews:
·AT&T Midwest
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to simmery said by simmery:I guess I got lucky. I installed SP3 right over NIS2008. No glitches so far. Same here and with a AMD processor everything is fine. -- "The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is." |
|
 OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium join:2003-12-08 Birmingham, AL | said by MagMan:said by simmery:I guess I got lucky. I installed SP3 right over NIS2008. No glitches so far. Same here and with a AMD processor everything is fine. May i ask why you like Norton? |
|
 MagManLife is simpler when you tell the truth.Premium join:2003-10-01 Westlake, OH Reviews:
·AT&T Midwest
·AT&T Midwest
1 edit | I don't necessarily like Norton, I just have never had any problems with it. I would probably use something if I had problems with it. But it does it's job for me, so why fix something that is not broke. -- "The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is." |
|
 OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium join:2003-12-08 Birmingham, AL | said by MagMan:I don't necessarily like Norton, I just have never had any problems with it. I would probably use something if I had problems with it. But it does it's job for me, so why fix something that is not broke. How do you know your computer is %100 free of infections you can run NOD32 web scanner »www.eset.com/onlinescan/ and i bet it will find an infection. |
|
 MagManLife is simpler when you tell the truth.Premium join:2003-10-01 Westlake, OH Reviews:
·AT&T Midwest
·AT&T Midwest
| said by Oleg:said by MagMan:I don't necessarily like Norton, I just have never had any problems with it. I would probably use something if I had problems with it. But it does it's job for me, so why fix something that is not broke. How do you know your computer is %100 free of infections you can run NOD32 web scanner » www.eset.com/onlinescan/ and i bet it will find an infection. I would bet it wouldn't my system is clean, and don't start on the bashing of Norton to me. Like I said it does the job for me, so end of subject as far as I am concerned.  -- "The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is." |
|
 jerry666Premium join:2002-12-12 Sainte-Anne-Des-Lacs, QC | reply to dave norton implied other security suites had this problem , I'm just stating 4 dif security apps I use had no problem. statistically unimportant , just my observation |
|
 | reply to Oleg I'm not a Norton fan. For that matter, I'm not a fan of any security application. I change brands all the time, just to see what they're like. The end result is that I think they're all fine. I rarely have problems with any of them -- errors, bloat, or other things that people complain about.
Right now, I'm using NIS 2008 because it doesn't bother me, I'm used to it, and it seems to offer reasonable protection. I occasionally do an online scan to see if NIS has missed something, but nothing ever turns up. This is probably because I don't go to shady places on the internet, don't open questionable emails, and so on.
People who take more risks may wish to batten down the OS itself rather than rely on a suite or a raft of individual programs. I'm not interested in doing all that, so I use suites made by NIS, McAfee, Trend Micro -- whatever. It depends on who has the features I want when my subscription is about to run out. NIS usually wins.
If I don't want to mess with a third-party firewall (say, on my gaming machine), I use NOD32 and the Windows firewall. I don't understand all this carrying-on about brands. They change all the time. Some have better years than others. Who cares. |
|
 bcastnerPremium,VIP,MVM join:2002-09-25 Chevy Chase, MD kudos:7 | reply to Oleg Symantec's claim that other Antivirus applications have had this issue of extra registry entries has not proved to hold water.
quote: After a lot of testing, weve reproduced a number of different cases where applying the XP SP3 upgrade adds additional registry keys within already existing Symantec registry keys. The Symantec keys affected vary from machine to machine and the effects of these added keys vary as well. We are still trying to understand why the upgrade is adding these keys. We have determined that the SymProtect feature is involved, though this issue is not exclusive to Symantec customers. Weve seen reports from various users who are not running Symantec products.
To help prevent this issue from occurring, you should disable SymProtect prior to installing the Windows XP SP3 upgrade.
This setting, in Norton Internet Security 2008 and Norton AntiVirus 2008, can be found within the Options page as Turn on protection for Norton products. In this case you should uncheck the box prior to the upgrade. After the upgrade is complete, please remember to re-enable this feature. . For Norton SystemWorks 2008 you have to go to the Advanced Options UI that is under Settings. Next, click on "Norton SystemWorks Options" and select the General tab. Lastly, uncheck the box that says, "Turn on protection for my Symantec product. . For Norton SystemWorks 2008 Premier you can use either the previous instructions or the Norton AntiVirus instructions. . For Norton 360, disable the "SymProtect Tamper Protection" quick control within the settings page. . For those who have already applied the upgrade and are running into problems, were working on a stand-alone tool that would delete the extraneous registry keys.
-Reese Anschultz Sr. SQA Manager Symantec Corporation
It is clearly the "Self Protection" feature of Norton/Symantec products at fault.
By the way, if you did not follow the Symantec advice above and disable this feature, and have registry corruption after the installation of Service Pack 3, I wrote a "fix" for this: »aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=3···k=t&sd=a -- ============ MS-MVP 2004 - -2008, ASAP Member Users Helping Users
|
|
 amysheehanPremium,VIP,MVM join:1999-12-21 Huntington Beach, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to Oleg From the original article: In a post to a Symantec support forum, Reese Anschultz, a senior manager with the company, said users of Norton Internet Security, Norton AntiVirus and Norton 360 -- the firm's best-selling consumer security software titles -- should switch off the "SymProtect" feature before trying to install XP SP3.
"After a lot of testing, we've reproduced a number of different cases where applying the XP SP3 upgrade adds additional registry keys within already-existing Symantec registry keys," said Anschultz.
I have and will continue to recommend this practice when doing ANY major updating to your OS - the protect feature may hinder needed registry key changes during the process.
The Symantec official quoted in this article Reese Anschultz is a member here at dslr as well and his advice is the best in the biz. He will work with any problem to see that it is resolved thru long hours and research with any department or section that is necessary to get a solution.
Any software that may prevent changes to your registry presents the same set of potential risks IMO.
-amy-
 -- Proud Member of ASAP DSLR Phishtracker |
|
 DownTheShoreTag, you're itPremium join:2003-12-02 Beautiful NJ kudos:11 | reply to Oleg Forgive me if I'm being dense here, but when one is doing a major SP update, doesn't it make sense to shut down all extraneous running programs first? You know, like every single software program installer always tells you to?  -- Life is simply one damned thing after another. |
|
 Dude111An Awesome DudePremium join:2003-08-04 USA kudos:10 Reviews:
·Time Warner VOIP
| reply to jerry666 quote: symantec says others are having this problem . well I've updated 8 computers , 3 with AVG , 2 with avast 1 with trend 1 with avira and 1 with panda , none has had any problems and they were a mix of AMD and intel . norton went downhill years ago .
Your quite lucky my friend! |
|
 amysheehanPremium,VIP,MVM join:1999-12-21 Huntington Beach, CA kudos:9 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to Oleg To all: Please read this M$ article before installing: »support.microsoft.com/kb/949377
Includes the following advice: Method 1: Download and then install the full Windows XP Service Pack 3 download package from the Microsoft Download Center Download and then try to install the full Windows XP Service Pack 3 download package from the Microsoft Download Center.
For more information about how to download Windows XP Service Pack 3, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: 322389 (»support.microsoft.com/kb/322389/) How to obtain the latest Windows XP service pack Back to the top
Method 2: Restart the computer, and then close or disable any antivirus or antispyware program that may be running
One of the most common causes of installation failure is when a third-party program holds a file open or locks a file that the service pack installer needs. To help prevent this issue, follow these steps before you install Windows XP SP3: 1. Exit all programs on the computer, and then restart the computer. 2. After you restart the computer, close or disable any antivirus or any antispyware programs that may be running.
Note You can disable the programs from the notification area. To disable a program from the notification area, right-click the third-party program icon, and then click an option to close or to disable the application. 3. After you close the antivirus program or the antispyware program, install Windows XP SP3 from the full download package that you downloaded in Method 1.
Note You may also install Windows XP SP3 from the Windows Update site or from the Microsoft Update site. 4. After Windows XP SP3 installation is complete, enable the antivirus program or the antispyware program that you disabled in step 2. -- Proud Member of ASAP DSLR Phishtracker |
|
 CudniLa Merma - VigiladoPremium,MVM join:2003-12-20 Someshire kudos:13 | reply to Oleg i think it is good advice in general to disable AV, irrespective of what that AV is, when doing such major updates like a Service Pack install. Or other security software that scans and protects the system. When such an amount of, beneficial, changes occur on a system it is better not to obstruct the process
Cudni -- "Mercifully, he hit him with the soft end of the pistol." Help yourself so God can help you. Microsoft MVP, 2006 - 2008 |
|
 | reply to Oleg And YOU ALL ACT LIKE SYMANTEC IS INTELLIGENT and ON YOUR SIDE.
Remembre the SONY dvd virus crapola, that many leading venders did not catch.
Makes ya wonder don't it. |
|
 jerry666Premium join:2002-12-12 Sainte-Anne-Des-Lacs, QC | reply to amysheehan so then why in the hell does MS set up automatic updates ?? that is a sure way to bork a comp no ? or does the auto update shut down all security apps ?? |
|