en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to Lumberjack
Re: Would this conflict with an active cable signal?
Somehow, I don't think this is considered BPL.
Usage is limited to about 1 house. HAMs would have to be pointing a yagi at my house to pick anything up.. and I suspect they'd get interference from other devices (like my PC) first.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
Lumberjack
Premium
join:2003-01-18
Newport News, VA
| reply to en102
OMG BPL in your house.... how dare you emit signal that interferes with those damned ham'ers!!!!
BBR will shun you now! 
--
»www.fairtax.org |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to Karl Bode
Cool.
I've already got the Powerline HDX101.
MOCA is good in that it should have low signal loss/interference (vs. powerline)
Powerline is good in that you have any outlet in the house (many!).
I've got a lot better range/stability on ethernet over powerline than I did on WiFi (esp for SSH/X11 sessions), and typically obtain ~50Mbps throughput. Downside is that they should have used gigabit ports vs. 100Mbps ports.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
