 RyanG1Premium
join:2002-02-10
San Antonio, TX
2 edits | Rhode Island? Considering the size of Rhode Island no wonder its in the top rankings...lol.
I also like how on the other chart it says % slower than 256mbps. Typos are fun. |
|
 brandonSome truth included in this post.Premium
join:2003-03-31
Hurley, MS | said by RyanG1:I also like how on the other chart it says % slower than 256mbps. Typos are fun. That's not a typo. |
|
 tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 | if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data. |
|
 amarryatVerizon FiOS
join:2005-05-02
Marshfield, MA
 ·Verizon FiOS
| said by tiger72:if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data. How do you figure? |
|
 Vamp5c077Premium
join:2003-01-28
MD
kudos:1 | said by amarryat:said by tiger72:if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data. How do you figure? So you fall into the 80+ (over 90+ for MA) percent of people that have OVER 256mbps??
--
15/15 FIOS || MSN Msgr: scott001^gmail_com |
|
damoxPremium
join:2002-01-07
Olympia, WA Reviews:
 ·Comcast Formerl..
| reply to RyanG1
What's surprising is that New Jersey which has a higher population density than Rhode Island (2nd in the US) and has the second highest median income of all fifty states, is not even in the top ten for fastest broadband connected states!
--
DAMOX Proud to be a member of Team Discovery |
|
|
|
amarryatVerizon FiOS
join:2005-05-02
Marshfield, MA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
2 edits | reply to Vamp
said by Vamp:said by amarryat:said by tiger72:if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data. How do you figure? So you fall into the 80+ (over 90+ for MA) percent of people that have OVER 256mbps?? One chart is showing % of connections over 5mbit, and the other is showing % of connections below 256kbit. Makes sense to me. I guess the m versus the k in 256? I glossed right over that. I guess if that was not a typo, then all those percentages should be about 100! |
|
 dennismurphyPut me on hold? I'll put YOU on holdPremium
join:2002-11-19
Parsippany, NJ
·Verizon FiOS
·Optimum Online
| reply to damox
said by damox:What's surprising is that New Jersey which has a higher population density than Rhode Island (2nd in the US) and has the second highest median income of all fifty states, is not even in the top ten for fastest broadband connected states! .... not all that surprising, believe it or not.
While parts of NJ are incredibly densely packed (here's looking at you Hoboken), there's still a bunch of farmland and forestry. There are still parts of NJ where high speed broadband tops out at 1.5mbit -- or worse.
Surprising, I guess, because Cablevision covers most of NJ, and they offer 15mbit as a standard package with their Optimum Online service. |
|
| said by dennismurphy:...not all that surprising, believe it or not. I don't think it is that surprising either for a totally different reason. Most New Jerseyites don't use Akamai's crappy Web 2.0 services. 
But all seriousness it does say on the report that
quote:
This report will include data gathered across Akamai’s global server network about attack traffic and broadband adoption
Those who usually rely on Akamai's services are business so the title should be The State of Businesses on Internet or The State of Our Best Customers. 
Unfortunately there are not allot of large businesses in NJ anymore who need to rely on a top notch global network let alone broadband. And for those pharmaceuticals companies that have not left their offices for foreign shores probably use their own intranet which is more secure.
Delaware on the otherhand is the corporate captital of the US, at least on the east coast. |
|
