<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Rhode Island? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20562737</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:05:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:05:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Rhode Island?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20569271</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/552792"><b>Dr Demento</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  dennismurphy <A HREF="/useremail/u/723909"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>...not all that surprising, believe it or not.<br> </div>I don't think it is that surprising either for a totally different reason. Most New Jerseyites don't use Akamai's crappy Web 2.0 services. :p<br><br>But all seriousness it does say on the report that<br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>This report will include data gathered across Akamai&#146;s global server network about attack traffic and broadband adoption<hr></blockquote><br><br>Those who usually rely on Akamai's services are business so the title should be <i>The State of Businesses on Internet</i> or <i>The State of Our Best Customers.</i> :D<br><br>Unfortunately there are not allot of large businesses in NJ anymore who need to rely on a top notch global network let alone broadband. And for those pharmaceuticals companies that have not left their offices for foreign shores probably use their own intranet which is more secure.<br><br>Delaware on the otherhand is the <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delaware_corporation">corporate captital</a> of the US, at least on the east coast.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20569271</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:38:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rhode Island?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20562737</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/723909"><b>dennismurphy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  damox <A HREF="/useremail/u/556416"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>What's surprising is that New Jersey which has a higher population density than Rhode Island (2nd in the US) and has the second highest median income of all fifty states, is not even in the top ten for fastest broadband connected states!<br> </div>.... not all that surprising, believe it or not.<br><br>While parts of NJ are incredibly densely packed (here's looking at you Hoboken), there's still a bunch of farmland and forestry.  There are still parts of NJ where high speed broadband tops out at 1.5mbit -- or worse.<br><br>Surprising, I guess, because Cablevision covers most of NJ, and they offer 15mbit as a standard package with their Optimum Online service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20562737</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 10:08:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rhode Island?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20562188</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1197971"><b>amarryat</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Vamp <A HREF="/useremail/u/761749"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  amarryat <A HREF="/useremail/u/1197971"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  tiger72 <A HREF="/useremail/u/356174"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data.<br> </div>How do you figure?<br> </div>So you fall into the 80+ (over 90+ for MA) percent of people that have OVER 256mbps?? <br> <br> :uhh: :uhh:<br> </div>One chart is showing % of connections over 5mbit, and the other is showing % of connections below 256kbit.  Makes sense to me.  I guess the m versus the k in 256?  I glossed right over that.  I guess if that was not a typo, then all those percentages should be about 100!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20562188</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 07:11:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rhode Island?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20559963</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/556416"><b>damox</b></A> : What's surprising is that New Jersey which has a higher population density than Rhode Island (2nd in the US) and has the second highest median income of all fifty states, is not even in the top ten for fastest broadband connected states!<br><small>--<br>DAMOX <b><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,1564398;root=disco;mode=flat#1564398"> Proud to be a member of Team Discovery</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20559963</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 19:15:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rhode Island?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20559203</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/761749"><b>Vamp</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  amarryat <A HREF="/useremail/u/1197971"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  tiger72 <A HREF="/useremail/u/356174"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data.<br> </div>How do you figure?<br> </div>So you fall into the 80+ (over 90+ for MA) percent of people that have OVER 256mbps?? <br> <br> :uhh: :uhh:<br><small>--<br>15/15 FIOS  || MSN Msgr: scott001^gmail_com</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20559203</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:46:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rhode Island?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20558854</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1197971"><b>amarryat</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  tiger72 <A HREF="/useremail/u/356174"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data.<br> </div>How do you figure?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20558854</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:58:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rhode Island?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20558826</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/356174"><b>tiger72</b></A> : if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20558826</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:54:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rhode Island?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20558168</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/793276"><b>brandon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RyanG1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/582272"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I also like how on the other chart it says % slower than 256mbps. Typos are fun.<br> </div>That's not a typo.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20558168</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:01:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rhode Island?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20557126</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/582272"><b>RyanG1</b></A> : Considering the size of Rhode Island no wonder its in the top rankings...lol.<br>I also like how on the other chart it says % slower than 256mbps. Typos are fun.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20557126</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:56:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
