site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Chainzz
Aka Snippy

join:2004-07-26
Sarnia, ON
Reviews:
·Cogeco Cable

reply to yock

Re: And I DON'T want to see them

said by yock:

Isn't the value of your real estate more important than data services? You're talking about a net loss to your property value so that others may reap the benefits.
I'm thinking property values will suffer with no data access, I will never buy another lot or house without highspeed....damn they can throw a node in my yard along with some bushes or tree's.


yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Miamisburg, OH
kudos:3

said by Chainzz:

said by yock:

Isn't the value of your real estate more important than data services? You're talking about a net loss to your property value so that others may reap the benefits.
I'm thinking property values will suffer with no data access, I will never buy another lot or house without highspeed....damn they can throw a node in my yard along with some bushes or tree's.
First of all, I don't think we're there yet, and it will never be universal. Depending on the property location, rural, urban, or suburban, property value may fluctuyate little or not at all if it doesn't have broadband access.

Secondly, AT&T isn't paying for the landscaping here. As the homeowner, it would be your responsibility to finance hundreds of dollars of landscaping, not to mention ongoing maintenance, to hide this stuff. You would then also assume liability for any damage that your landscaping caused to AT&T's boxes. Root encroachment, tool damage, you name it. Your homeowner's insurance would reflect this new liability too, also affecting the net change in property value.

Wednesday, 30-May 23:29:53 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics