<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Only in Qu&#x26;eacute;bec... as others noted in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20568909</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:28:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:28:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Only in Qu&#x26;eacute;bec... as others noted</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20568909</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917504"><b>Quake110</b></A> : But it should be interesting because Qu&eacute;bec uses the civil law, hence, they are not bound by precedents like in the common law.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20568909</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 13:15:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
