<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Cell tower triangulation isn&#x27;t that bad either in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20574987</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:13:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:13:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Cell tower triangulation isn&#x27;t that bad either</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20574987</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/510249"><b>Guspaz</b></A> : The worst I've ever had it do is about 250m away from my actual location. In some areas, it can peg me down to maybe 20m.<br><br>My conclusion: It's good enough for a wide range of topics. Automatically zooming in a map to your general area. Giving you weather info. And even location-sensitive searches.<br><br>If I want to search for "pizza", and it thinks that I'm a quarter kilometer away, that's not a big deal; it's only up to an extra 3 minutes of walking.<br><br>In short, I don't need hyper-accurate positioning on a cellphone, I just need "good enough", which I have.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20574987</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:51:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
