Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast Begins Testing 'Protocol Agnostic' Network Management » Beware of the backlash from your customers.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Good luck with that Comcast »
« At peak times? or only during congestion?  
AuthorAll Replies

jc100

join:2002-04-10


1 edit
reply to LLivingLarge
Re: Beware of the backlash from your customers.

Seriously, here is what I deem fair and would alleviate these ISPS of lawsuits, investigations, etc.

On advertisements say your speed is UP TO X amount. Then make it clear in the legal text that users who exceed a specified cap (make it universal and clear cut).. say 200GB will be subject to speed reductions. IE those with maybe 10/1 will only see 3/512 or something. You get the gist. This basically makes it so ISPS are still customer friendly and also helps reduce traffic and usage on their network for the mega users. Seriously, I think this would be a better idea than caps, traffic shaping, etc. It's about the closet win win one could hope for today. Customer's aren't stuck with huge bills, and ISPS limit traffic by slowing down mega users at least at peak times.

jarthur31

join:2006-04-14
Carlsbad, NM

Man you make too much sense! But the thing with that logic is if it diminishes their bottom line corporate America will never adopt such a policy. They surely don't want to scare away new victims, I mean customers.

I have nothing against caps either but they need to spell it out in black and white and allow the consumer to view how much traffic they're generating. They should've started doing this years ago instead of lying. And remove the most aggregious offenders.

Yes, I have done and will continue to do some d/l and u/l but I've never consumed more than 40 gb in any month that I've had broadband. It makes me angry that they think it's ok to just throttle everything and reduce my d/l speed to under 100 kb/s when my connection is really 8 times faster than that.
Forums » Comcast Begins Testing 'Protocol Agnostic' Network ManagementGood luck with that Comcast »
« At peak times? or only during congestion?  


Thursday, 26-Nov 17:49:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [106] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [69] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [61] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [41] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [37] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [34] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [34] Despite Billions In USF Fees, U.S. Libraries Lack Bandwidth
Most people now reading
· I'll Just Unplug That... [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· Rogers Rocket Stick [Rogers]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]