<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Good Implementation for WiFi&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589219</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:33:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:33:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Implementation for WiFi</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20592393</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : Nope.  Nothing like that on this network.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20592393</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:53:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Implementation for WiFi</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20592185</link>
<description><![CDATA[patcat88 posted : What about face fingerprinting to catch National Security, probation/home arrest violations, and on "innocent" people, track their movements and sell it to marketing research firms to sell to advertisers, turn your head at a store or an ad, and you will get junk mail for that. Walk into a doctors office, and if your old, your get blood pressure and diabeters. Walk slowly and be a senior citizen (face to age cross referencing) and you'll get calls from electric wheelchair salesmen.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20592185</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:16:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Implementation for WiFi</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589569</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : The Cameras they refer to are things like traffic cameras measuring traffic density and cameras at lights to help determine efficient patterns of light changes for maximum traffic flow amd easing congestion.  They are not red light cameras or speed cameras and the like.....<br><br>I guess though that the use of security cameras will grow, watching public areas like parks, sporting venues and the like.<br><br>This isn't necessarily bad.<br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589569</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:43:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Implementation for WiFi</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589546</link>
<description><![CDATA[toby posted : Video cameras yes, more cities should do this.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589546</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:40:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Implementation for WiFi</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589540</link>
<description><![CDATA[MarkyD posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1085749" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1085749');">NOCMan</a>:</small><br><br>They apparently snuck in some big brother as well.<br> </div>yes...that part I don't like at all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589540</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:40:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Implementation for WiFi</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589514</link>
<description><![CDATA[NOCMan posted : They apparently snuck in some big brother as well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589514</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:35:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Good Implementation for WiFi</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589290</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : And it snuck in under the radar and for a very low budget considering the size and scope of the project, plus it has very real applications for the city that will save them money long term.<br><br>Kudos.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589290</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:03:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Good Implementation for WiFi</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589219</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : This is a good use for large-scale WiFi. The number of users is known and it has a specific purpose than can be planned and engineered to support.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Good-Implementation-for-WiFi-20589219</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:51:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

