http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20600413 en Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:52:32 EDT Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:52:32 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20600413 Jason Levine : And I would be extremely pissed off if I were the website operator. When I put ads on my website, it means one or two things:

1 - I, or the charity the ad is for, am making money off of the ad in question.
2 - I approve of this company's service.

By replacing those ads with other ads, they are depriving me of income, depriving charities of income, and using my name to insinuate that I approve of a product or service that I might actually be opposed to.

In fact, I would call this fraud since they are fraudulently using my (hopefully good) name and reputation to sell something. I could be defamation of character too. After all, if the product/service is bad, then my name/reputation might be damaged as a result.
--
-Jason Levine
Support a children's charity. Buy a calendar. Shooting For A Cause
Jason's Toolbox | PCQandA.com]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20600413 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:45:13 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20597666 sbrook : If I was the original advertiser, I would be SO PISSED OFF. Again, it's all a matter of the sanctity of the content of packets being violated. Even if it's an ad!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20597666 Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:40:19 EDT