<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Wireless Networking&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-20595872</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:19:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:19:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22996784</link>
<description><![CDATA[stevech0 posted : IP throughput (your useful speed) is abouty 60-70% of the raw wireless bit rate, e.g., the best 11g can do is about 24Mbps.<br><br>11n speed depends on how compatible vendor A and B are if you have mixed vendors in the access point/router and clients, if there are any non-11n clients slowing things, if your hardware and interference condition can permit channel-pair-bonding, and many other factors. It will vary day to day.<br><br>Of course, we all know that speeds well beyond what your Cable Modem or DSL or other means your ISP uses are not important- except for inter-PC data on the LAN. Windows file shares are hard to run at very high speeds due to overhead in windows.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22996784</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:47:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22993867</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Using a Dell Inspriron laptop, Windows XP, and a Trendnet TEW-664UB USB adaptor on my upper floor and a Trendnet 11n wireless router on my first floor I am seeing Physical Layer Speeds of 270.0 Mbps since I reconfigured my router. <br>I know it is advertised as 300Mbps but I just haven't tweaked that high of speed out of it. <br>It is noticeably faster than my 11g Linksys router (which only showed 54Mbps). <br>Should YOU buy an 11n router? Only if you want higher speeds on your remote device. For under $100.00 you can more than double your speed. I have had this on 24/7 for over 1 week with no loss of 100% signal. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22993867</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:21:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22993742</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : This charts shows you..<br><br> <IMG SRC="http://pic19.picturetrail.com/VOL1099/4465559/21344768/361480637.jpg"> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22993742</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:42:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22976742</link>
<description><![CDATA[stevech0 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by watchin :</small><br><br>My throughput speed on my laptop is more than doubled (but not 300mbps, only 130mbps). <br> </div>Throughput or wireless connection speed? Quite different.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22976742</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:47:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22972046</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I just installed a 11n router (TRENDnet) and a TRENDnet adaptor for my laptop. The router cost $27 and the USB adaptor $49. The router is a dual antenna and replaced my Linksys G only router (the TRENDnet is g and n). My throughput speed on my laptop is more than doubled (but not 300mbps, only 130mbps). I know, this is brand new stuff, not New Old Stock or anything. I am using Windows Vista on my main computer which is wired to Comcast cable. Laptop uses XP. It has been stable for several days. The Linksys was stable at 54mbps 24/7 for over 4 years. I am keeping it for a backup. <br>I did try a Dlink 11n router and it would not stay connected. It went back. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22972046</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 02:18:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22964757</link>
<description><![CDATA[No_Strings posted : Saw today's Dilbert and thought it was appropriate for this thread.<br><br><br>[att=1]<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22964757?c=1465069&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMDYwMTkwNC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="49389 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=186 SRC="/r0/download/1465069.thumb600~b1278267b6c8856820d9cb6b65d6a67a/dilbert_standards.gif/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22964757</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:00:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22964561</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : No.<br><br>Esp. don't buy a Netgear WRN2000 because it simply doesn't work.<br><br> I spent days loading wireless drivers and even re-loaded ubuntu... (based on other people's apparent issues)  but to my horror, but not surprise, I have found that my laptop connects at every wireless hotspot and today I connected to a wireless g router without issues.  So it seems I have wasted my money and I cannot get any support from netgear.<br><br>So much for wireless N being backwards compatible...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22964561</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:44:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22947516</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : I use both 5.8GHz and DECT 6.0 (1.9GHz) with a N network DECT 6.0 phones seems to work better. A lot of the 5.8GHz are really 2.4GHz even though they claim to be 5.8GHz and some brands go even cheaper and make the 5.8GHz a dual band but not with 2.4GHz and actually 900MHz. You should check the specs or contact the DECT 6.0 phone maker before you shell out money for such a phone.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22947516</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:50:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22917853</link>
<description><![CDATA[PGHammer posted : An additional datapoint:<br><br>I directly replaced my WRT54GS with a WRT310N (there are no N devices on the network), keeping the same security settings and passphrase (different SSID, however).  The same devices connect without issues.  It is for precisely this reason why (barring other issues, such as cross-compatibility) I'd find it incredible to believe that G would work where N (even draft-N) would not.<br><br>The router in question is not a new WRT310N, but a WRT310N that was surplused by a family member I had done some network jobs for when their ISP (VZ) replaced their wired-only DSL router with a wireless-G router.  (The only wireless devices are wireless-N; however, I foresee no issues for the same reason the N router will have no issues with G  devices; backward compatibility.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22917853</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:08:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22909464</link>
<description><![CDATA[No_Strings posted : I only found one manual for a GE DECT and it specifies the 1.9GHz band. <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=3&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tvears.com%2Fpdf%2F27907-GE-Manual.pdf&ei=EGeQSp7DO4j-M8n8nbAK&rct=j&q=ge+dect+6.0+phone+manual&usg=AFQjCNFrJzdUtSP7TPe87LXz_ZhLw_yj_Q" >www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w&middot;&middot;&middot;hLw_yj_Q</A><br><br>All of the other online references to GE DECT I looked at (about 10) list DECT 6.0 as the operating frequency.  Again, 1.9G.<br><br>Not trying to pick a fight, just making sure we're all on the same page so someone looking for a phone isn't steered in the wrong direction.  If you want something with no chance of interference, buy an old 900MHz (hard to find any more) or DECT 6.0.  Others can be a problem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22909464</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:53:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22909413</link>
<description><![CDATA[PGHammer posted : From the documentation, GE's DECT phone system operates in the 5.8 GHz band (and it's a residential, not business, DECT system aimed expressly at US homes).<br><br>However, the same issue would still occur with traditional 5.8 GHz devices if you have too many on the same channel  (that is why it makes sense to avoid channel 6 with 2.4 GHz N or G, entirely because it's a default setting, and thus often used).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22909413</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:41:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22909288</link>
<description><![CDATA[mozerd posted : The original DECT frequency band (1880 MHz&#150;1900 MHz) is used in all countries in Europe. Outside Europe, it is used in most of Asia, Australia and South America<br><br>In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission in 2005 changed channelization and licensing costs in a nearby band (1920 MHz&#150;1930 MHz, or 1.9 GHz), known as Unlicensed Personal Communications Services (UPCS), allowing DECT devices to be sold in the U.S. with only minimal changes. These channels are reserved exclusively for voice communication applications and therefore are less likely to experience interference from other wireless devices such as baby monitors and wireless networks.<br><br>The above is taken from the following link:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Enhanced_Cordless_Telecommunications" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_En&middot;&middot;&middot;ications</A><br><small>--<br>David Mozer<br><A HREF="http://expertoncall.us"> IT-Expert on Call </a><br> Information Technology for Home and Business</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22909288</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:11:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22908853</link>
<description><![CDATA[No_Strings posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/823990" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=823990');">PGHammer</a>:</small><br><br>1.  Are there a lot of DECT cordless phones in the area?  (Most newer DECT phones use the same 5 GHz band that high-band N devices use; the older DECT phones, and most cordless *standard* phones, share the 2.4 GHz band with N and wireless-G.)<br><br>From what the poster with the range-gate issues with N was commenting on, the first (DECT phones and lots of them) is more likely (since his issue was with dual-band N, which was created to avoid a similar issue with older cordless/DECT phone systems in the 2.4 GHz band that is shared with these devices and wireless-G).<br> </div>Not true.<br><br>DECT phones will not interfer with A,B, G or N.  They operate entirely outside of either the 2.4GHz or 5.8GHz bands.<br><br>Cordless phones in the US can operate at 900MHz, 2.4GHz or 5.8GHz, but none are DECT.  <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Enhanced_Cordless_Telecommunications" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_En&middot;&middot;&middot;ications</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.tech-faq.com/cordless-phone-frequencies.shtml" >www.tech-faq.com/cordless-phone-&middot;&middot;&middot;es.shtml</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22908853</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:20:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22908802</link>
<description><![CDATA[PGHammer posted : If G works where N (especially dual-band N) does not, then there is something decidedly unusual about the area you are in.<br><br>1.  Are there a lot of DECT cordless phones in the area?  (Most newer DECT phones use the same 5 GHz band that high-band N devices use; the older DECT phones, and most cordless *standard* phones, share the 2.4 GHz band with N and wireless-G.)<br><br>2.  How many other wireless-N networks are there within range?  (Multiple N networks operating on the same channel, even with encryption, are going to have crosstalk issues; the same issue applies to G, of course.)<br><br>From what the poster with the range-gate issues with N was commenting on, the first (DECT phones and lots of them) is more likely (since his issue was with dual-band N, which was created to avoid a similar issue with older cordless/DECT phone systems in the 2.4 GHz band that is shared with these devices and wireless-G).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22908802</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:08:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22908761</link>
<description><![CDATA[PGHammer posted : If you do local streaming (printing, video, or have NAS), you'd change your tune quickly.  Heck, even simple file-sharing (depending on the file size and type) is a good reason for N.  However, if you are going to deploy N (even draft-N), tther are several things that SHOULD (even MUST) be done.<br><br>1.  Wireless devices - upgrade as many to N as possible (preferably all).  A network is typically only as fast as the slowest connection, and the slowest connections on any N network will be wireless.  However, that connection should be no worse than single-band N, not G, and certainly not B!<br><br>2.  Wired connections - upgrade as many to gigabit as possible; if not possible, upgrade them to wireless-N.  The reasoning is the same as above (the network is only as fast as the slowest connection).<br><br>3.  Any wireless-N router should be, at minimum, dual-band simultaneous (MIMO-N) and have gigabit WAN *and* LAN ports.  USB-based NAS at the router is needed if you have two or fewer wired gigabit devices connected to it; however, it usually isn't if you have three or four.  (Any PC will have more USB ports available, even without external hubs, than USB at the router.  At-the-PC connections also allows the option of external SATA (eSATA) which is far faster than USB for NAS.)<br><br>4.  Last, and far from least; remember the raison d'etre for N.  Wireless-N (compared to wireless-G or any other LAN standard) is all about connection speed *within the LAN*.  Wireless-N (in fact, no LAN standard) can't do anything about external bottlenecks (so not even wired gigabit can ameliorate a server-side bandwidth crunch).<br><br>Recommended residential N router - Linksys by Cisco WRT610N.<br><br>Why this router - First off, it meets alll the requirements I laid down (all wired ports are gigabit, supports MIMO-N); second, it's easy to set up (as are most Linksys routers; I've set up the little-brother WRT160N, which has for some reason given a lot of reviewers pain, and I found it easier than setting up my personal WRT54GS, which I've had for four years); lastly, it's relatively inexpensive (even at full retail, it's almost never $200).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22908761</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:54:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22846877</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mrtchuck posted : Clone may or may not be true as there is a TEW-633GR v 1.1. Also I have both units and as the performance may be similar, the stability is not even close and to me diminishes the minor performance advantage of the DIR-655. I also appreciate the bridge mode (which Dlink dropped) along with my router rarely has to be rebooted. (Only when modem is unresponsive) Of the two units I would suggest the TEW-633GR also.  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22846877</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:11:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22822800</link>
<description><![CDATA[payBack0 posted : <div class="bquote">I suggest to buy a Trendnet TEW-633 N router. It has the best performance and stability under $80.<br> </div>As I understand, the TEW-633GR is just a DLink DIR-655 clone:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30308/96/1/6/" >www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/&middot;&middot;&middot;/96/1/6/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22822800</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:20:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22680351</link>
<description><![CDATA[slpip3 posted : I suggest to buy a Trendnet TEW-633 N router.  It has the best performance and stability under $80.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22680351</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:40:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22678456</link>
<description><![CDATA[Millenniumle posted : Looking for more range, N was worthless for me.  My G equipment I was looking to replace had better reception than the Linksys N equipment.  And I bought the latest and greatest, fancy Dual Band - Range Plus versions.  Both adaptor and router.  And what was their competition, you might ask?  A Road Runner provided Ambit wireless G, cable modem, combo unit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22678456</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:38:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22659052</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1070900" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1070900');">nwrickert</a>:</small><br><br>For me, there is no benefit.  Most of the traffic is to the internet, with little between LAN machines.  And the bottleneck for internet traffic is the ISP, not the local wireless.<br><br>There might be reasons to buy a router - actually, I did recently buy one.  But going "N" is not a reason, at least not for me.<br> </div>If going with N get a Gig Router do not go with 10/100...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22659052</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:17:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22654729</link>
<description><![CDATA[nwrickert posted : For me, there is no benefit.  Most of the traffic is to the internet, with little between LAN machines.  And the bottleneck for internet traffic is the ISP, not the local wireless.<br><br>There might be reasons to buy a router - actually, I did recently buy one.  But going "N" is not a reason, at least not for me.<br><small>--<br>AT&T dsl; Speedstream 5100b modem; openSuSE 11.0; firefox 3.0.11</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22654729</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:02:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22654513</link>
<description><![CDATA[fonzbear2000 posted : Based on my experience of upgrading from G to N: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22548159-Are-there-any-HIGHLY-rated-wireless-N-routers-for-under-50">Are there any HIGHLY rated wireless N routers for under $50?</A> YES! It is VERY MUCH worth it to upgrade!<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22511483-Check-this-out!">Check this out!</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22654513</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:57:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22542735</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/995338" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=995338');">mozerd</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1109005" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1109005');">tipstir</a>:</small><br><br>N1 is really old hardware and that router isn't even a Gig Wireless Router nor that it had USB Storage Feature. I had looked at the internals but that's Intel IXP420 NPU still couple with Atheros 3T3R. How you think that would do more in 2,000 sq house it beyond me. Atheros WPU have been lousy.  <br> </div>I have a small number of <b>N1 Vision</b> systems out there in 3k+ SQ FT size homes doing very well. FYI, each of the <b>N1 Vision</b> version 2000 I have installed certainly do have 1GB WAN Port and 4 1GB LAN ports. USB storage feature is pure CRAP.<br>Next time check your facts before you expose your etc.<br><A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=377018">NI Vision Specs</a><br>After landing on the page linked above click the Specs Tab and you will see <br>Ports  &#9;WAN-- 1 Gigabit Port LAN-- 4 Gigabit Ports <br> </div>Belkin N+<br> <IMG SRC="http://www.iteme.com/site/small_images/F5D8235_small.gif"> <br><br>NPU<br>RT2880F 266MHz <br><br>WPU<br>RT2820 2T3R<br><br>RAM 2x16 = 32MB <br>FLASH 8MB<br><br>Gig Switch (does support jumbo frames)<br>Realtek RTL8366SR  832Kbits SRAM Packet Buffer<br><br>USB Storage<br>NEC<br><br>I have check my facts there ..  N1 this one you have?<br><br>N1<br>N1 Vision<br> <IMG SRC="http://www.thg.ru/consumer/novogodnie_podarki_2007_2/images/belkin_n1_vision.jpg"> <br><br>NPU<br>Atheros AR7141 400MHz<br>RAM 16 MB <br>FLASH 8 MB <br><br>WPU<br>Atheros 2T3R design<br><br>GIG Ports<br>Vitesse 7385 (112KB Packet Buffer) <br><br>When you had said N1 this is the one..<br>  <IMG SRC="http://cache.gizmodo.com/images/2006/04/Rendering-N1-Router1.jpg"> <br><br>Outdated 10/100 with Intel NPU..<br><br>Anyway Belkin N+ USB storage isn't crap so you should get your facts on point there.  I have that and no issues with accessing the storage as network attached storage thus on USB.  Just \\ip of the router and that's it or in my case I use Suncross Network Drive Manager..<br><br>main screen<br> <IMG SRC="http://www.suncross.nl/ndm/screenshot01.jpg"> <br><br>configure screen<br> <IMG SRC="http://www.suncross.nl/ndm/screenshot02.jpg"> <br><br>option screen<br> <IMG SRC="http://www.suncross.nl/ndm/screenshot03.jpg"> <br><br>more about this one here<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.suncross.nl/ndm/" >www.suncross.nl/ndm/</A><br><br>Good way to monitor map drives on the network also lets you know when a system map drive is disconnected visually and tries to auto connect to the drive. Not free but you can try it out. Good more for wireless laptops though desktops. I use it on both anyway.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22542735</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:18:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22535180</link>
<description><![CDATA[mozerd posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1109005" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1109005');">tipstir</a>:</small><br><br>N1 is really old hardware and that router isn't even a Gig Wireless Router nor that it had USB Storage Feature. I had looked at the internals but that's Intel IXP420 NPU still couple with Atheros 3T3R. How you think that would do more in 2,000 sq house it beyond me. Atheros WPU have been lousy.  <br> </div>I have a small number of <b>N1 Vision</b> systems out there in 3k+ SQ FT size homes doing very well. FYI, each of the <b>N1 Vision</b> version 2000 I have installed certainly do have 1GB WAN Port and 4 1GB LAN ports. USB storage feature is pure CRAP.<br>Next time check your facts before you expose your etc.<br><A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=377018">NI Vision Specs</a><br>After landing on the page linked above click the Specs Tab and you will see <br>Ports  &#9;WAN-- 1 Gigabit Port LAN-- 4 Gigabit Ports <br><small>--<br>David Mozer<br><A HREF="http://expertoncall.us"> IT-Expert on Call </a> <br>Information Technology for Home and Business</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22535180</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:20:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22533851</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : N1 is really old hardware and that router isn't even a Gig Wireless Router nor that it had USB Storage Feature. I had looked at the internals but that's Intel IXP420 NPU still couple with Atheros 3T3R. How you think that would do more in 2,000 sq house it beyond me. Atheros WPU have been lousy.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22533851</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:49:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22528960</link>
<description><![CDATA[mozerd posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by leona949 :</small> The Intell WiFi Link 5100 AGN is not compatiable with an "N" router because it's not an "N" Wireless Notebook Card?</div> The Intell WiFi Link 5100 AGN is supposed to be compatible with the "N" draft standard so it should work with "N" Routers but from my experience with this specific intel implementation it does not work well.<div class="bquote"><small>said by leona949 :</small> If I want to use the technology from an "N" router then I need to replace the Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN with a matching "N" Wireless Notebook card to go with the Belkin N+?</div>Under Windows, in Device Manager you would disable the Intel WiFi Link 5100AGN. Now you need to make a decision based on whether you have a small home or a larger home.<br><div class="bquote"><small>said by leona949 :</small> If I walk into Fry's or Best Buy, what would I ask to buy?</div> If you have a small home [under 1,500 square feet] then you would buy the  Belkin N+ and the Belkin "N" Wireless Notebook Card. If you have a large home [2,000 or more square feet] then you would buy the Belkin N1 vision and the Belkin "N1" Wireless Notebook Card<br><div class="bquote"><small>said by leona949 :</small> Is this going to cost me $300+?</div> The N+ and N Notebook Card should cost you $200 or less. The N1 Vision and N1 Notebook Card should cost you $300 or less. <div class="bquote"><small>said by leona949 :</small> For the extra cost would I see a difference compare with what I currently have?</div>  Yes, if properly configured then you should see a significant difference.<br><small>--<br>David Mozer<br><A HREF="http://expertoncall.us"> IT-Expert on Call </a> <br>Information Technology for Home and Business</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22528960</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:31:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22528154</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : David, you are rediculous.  I read your post three times trying to understand your tech talk.  Here's my translation, please correct me if I'm wrong in SIMPLE English please.<br><br>The Intell WiFi Link 5100 AGN is not compatiable with an "N" router because it's not an "N" Wireless Notebook Card?  If I want to use the technology from an "N" router then I need to replace the Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN with a matching "N" Wireless Notebook card to go with the Belkin N+?<br><br>If I walk into Fry's or Best Buy, what would I ask to buy?  Belkin N+ and "N" Wireless Notebook Card?  They would understand what I'm talking about? because I sure don't understand what I just wrote.  Is this going to cost me $300+?  For the extra cost would I see a difference compare with what I currently have?  What I have now is a "G" router with an Intell WiFi Link 5100 AGN wireless card in my HP HDX Q9000. <br><br>Thank you.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22528154</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:34:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22516853</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/995338" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=995338');">mozerd</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by leona949 :</small><br><br>I just bought an HP HDX18 Q9000 which has an Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN. Would I see a difference if I buy an "N" router? How much of a difference? I do lots of files transfer and downloads, would "N" help?</div>IMO, the Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN technology will not provide you with long term satisfaction -- so if your objective is [a]performance via greater bandwidth and speed [b] greater range and [c] superior interference handling THEN you need to <b>match</b> technologies being used at the Router and at your HP HDX18 Q9000.<br><br>If you want to take advantage of "N" today then look at <A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=459640">the Belkin N+</a> and the matching <A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=372032">N Wireless Notebook Card</a> [using <b>2 x 3</b> radios/antennas etc.] or the <A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=377018">N1 Vision</a> and the matching <A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=273544">N1 Wireless Notebook Card</a> [using <b>3 x 3</b>  radios/antennas etc] <br><br>The KEY phrase is <b>matching</b>. The 2 WiFi Routers and matching Network interfaces I mention above us MIMO technology from a CHIP makes called <b>Ralink</b>. The Ralink MIMO system being used by Belkin in the products I mentioned is decent [not great like Airgo now Qualcomm tech] . The N1 Vision and its <b>matching</b> N1 Wireless Notebook card work better in larger homes because the N1 Vision and its <b>matching</b> N1 Wireless Notebook Card use 3 x 3  radios/antennas etc.<br><br>IF you do NOT <b>match</b> the technologies being used your level of satisfaction with the products will be <b>far</b> less.<br> </div>Atheros N 2T2R and 3T3R MIMO chips are not as stable I have those devices also prior to the Ralink for N.  Marvel N 3T3R MIMO no good. Broadcom N 3T3R MIMO still not convinced, I have that too. I have no issues using Ralink N with Realtek 8190 2T2R adapters.<br><br>Everything has to work together and don't believe you need to buy matching adapters for G or N. I've use Buffalo G/N routers/ap with Belkin and Buffalo adapters they work. I use Buffalo/Belkin/Trendnet adapters with Belkin N+ and works great! None of these adapters have Atheros! Once you introduce Atheros Router/AP issues happen. Still Intel wi-fi works with  Belkin N + without issues. <br><br>I've tested pretty much everything. Again I am not impress with Atheros. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22516853</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:13:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22514064</link>
<description><![CDATA[mozerd posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by leona949 :</small><br><br>I just bought an HP HDX18 Q9000 which has an Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN. Would I see a difference if I buy an "N" router? How much of a difference? I do lots of files transfer and downloads, would "N" help?</div>IMO, the Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN technology will not provide you with long term satisfaction -- so if your objective is [a]performance via greater bandwidth and speed [b] greater range and [c] superior interference handling THEN you need to <b>match</b> technologies being used at the Router and at your HP HDX18 Q9000.<br><br>If you want to take advantage of "N" today then look at <A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=459640">the Belkin N+</a> and the matching <A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=372032">N Wireless Notebook Card</a> [using <b>2 x 3</b> radios/antennas etc.] or the <A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=377018">N1 Vision</a> and the matching <A HREF="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=273544">N1 Wireless Notebook Card</a> [using <b>3 x 3</b>  radios/antennas etc] <br><br>The KEY phrase is <b>matching</b>. The 2 WiFi Routers and matching Network interfaces I mention above us MIMO technology from a CHIP makes called <b>Ralink</b>. The Ralink MIMO system being used by Belkin in the products I mentioned is decent [not great like Airgo now Qualcomm tech] . The N1 Vision and its <b>matching</b> N1 Wireless Notebook card work better in larger homes because the N1 Vision and its <b>matching</b> N1 Wireless Notebook Card use 3 x 3  radios/antennas etc.<br><br>IF you do NOT <b>match</b> the technologies being used your level of satisfaction with the products will be <b>far</b> less.<br><small>--<br>David Mozer<br><A HREF="http://expertoncall.us"> IT-Expert on Call </a> <br>Information Technology for Home and Business</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22514064</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:19:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22513780</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : You guys are too technical for me to understand everything that was posted here.  From what I read, it sounds like N doubles G in term of speed if your system uses N? <br><br>I currently have a Netgear WGRg14v6 which I bought in November 2006. I just bought an HP HDX18 Q9000 which has an Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN. Would I see a difference if I buy an "N" router? How much of a difference? I do lots of files transfer and downloads, would "N" help?  "G" is working for me now, but if I can get better speed, then I don't mind spending an additional $50.<br><br>For the non-tech and newbies, like myself, please reply in simple terms.<br><br>thank you all for taking the time to reply/post.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22513780</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 03:21:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22508867</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : Doesn't have to do 3T3R you can some now like the Belkin N+ Ralink RT2880F uses 2T3R MIMO method.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22508867</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:45:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22500325</link>
<description><![CDATA[mozerd posted : You should buy "N" if the "N" system you buy incorporates 3 critical technologies.<br><br>Why? without these critical technologies your "N" system [be it a Router or AP or any combination of either] will not give you the performance that you may expect or want.<br><br>The critical technologies are:<br><br>[1] 3x3 MIMO --- 3 transmit | receive radios and 3 antennas [3 of each <u>minimum</u>]<br>[2] Spatial Multiplexing<br>[3] Incorporating ASIC routines that exploit multipath.<br><br>What makes MIMO very special is when [1] is combined with [2] and [3] <b>if</b> its done the right way. There are multiple forms of MIMO and each CHIP promoter has their own unique way of doing MIMO <b>regardless</b> of what you may have read about the standards group have set for 802.11n<br><br>Spatial multiplexing allows for the transmission of multiple distinct data stream's over multiple radios in the same band at the same time, effectively doubling [or tripling or more] data throughput. Think of it as sipping water through two [or more] straws at once. Specifically, devices that exploit MIMO chipset and RF technology transmit two [2 or more] distinct datastreams simultaneously. This is what gives you the bandwidth that needed to Stream HD Video, Listen to digital music, Play online games, Transfer photos and home videos, Handle multiple VoIP phone calls <b>for more than 1 person at the same time</b>.<br><br>Properly implemented MIMO systems divide a data stream into multiple unique streams, each of which is modulated and transmitted through a different radio-antenna chain at the same time in the same frequency channel. By taking advantage of multipath, <b>reflections of the signals</b>, each MIMO receive antenna-radio chain is a linear combination of the multiple transmitted data streams. The data streams are separated at the receiver using proprietary MIMO algorithms that rely on estimates of all channels between each transmitter and each receiver.<br><br>Each multipath route can be treated as a separate channel creating multiple "virtual wires" over which to transmit signals. MIMO employs multiple, spatially separated antennas to take advantage of these "virtual wires" created by multipath and transfer more data. In addition to multiplying throughput, range is increased because of an antenna diversity advantage, since each receive antenna has a measurement of each transmitted data stream.<br><br>IF the "N" system you purchase does not incorporate [1] [2] and [3] I would speculate that YOU will be very unhappy with the performance of the system within a short order of time.<br><br>The only CHIP promoter that I know off that does "N" the correct way -- where you will derive a great deal of satisfaction is Airgo now owned by Qualcomm.<br><A HREF="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=74">Is Airgo the uncrowned king of 802.11n MIMO?</a><br><br><small>--<br>David Mozer<br><A HREF="http://expertoncall.us"> IT-Expert on Call </a> <br>Information Technology for Home and Business</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22500325</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:24:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22468568</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : Standard is slated by Sept 2009 for N now.. I did buy another N router as the DIR-655 can't keep a stable N connection or any wireless connection. Still that's a firmware issue or what they're saying at Dlink it's issue with NPU and WPU chip sets being different. I decided to try a another chip set in the past Marvel, Atheros, Broadcom never live up to the promises for N Draft 2.0 mode. Now with Realtek in the wireless N adapter and Ralink PU/WPU for Belkin N+ I don't have the issues I had with Buffalo, Trendnet, Netgear and Dlink N Routers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22468568</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 11:29:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22455717</link>
<description><![CDATA[No_Strings posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1354022" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1354022');">mobiledog</a>:</small><br><br>if your network stops when your microwave is on, sell your microwave and upgrade your network to "n".<br><br> </div>That made me chuckle and I heartily agree. <br><br>A couple of years ago, we did a kitchen remodel that included new appliances.  The "old" ones still seemed pretty new to me as the house was new when we moved in and they all still worked fine after 12 years or so.<br><br>My laptop would slow noticeably when the microwave was running.  I assumed that was pretty typical until we installed the new one.  Now, I get no slowing at all.  Makes me wonder how much RF I took to the noggin.<br><br>The whole "Should I buy N?" debate will soon become moot.  Prices are dropping and someday there will actually be a finalized standard.  Right now, though, it's still a valid question.  I appreciate the thoughtful input.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22455717</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:35:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22455449</link>
<description><![CDATA[mobiledog posted : the best bottom line question for home user thinking about moving to "n" is...<br><br>do you have issues with interference with your 802.11 network? <br><br>if your network stops when your microwave is on, sell your microwave and upgrade your network to "n".<br><br>If your neighbor's garage door opener makes your network go wild, upgrade to "n". <br><br>are there specific times of the day that your network appears to struggle to get anything through, either up or downloading? if so, think about trying "n"<br><br>IF you decide to go the "n" route, be sure you are buying the 5GHz flavor, and not the 2.4GHz flavor, and that you get the proper matching PC card for your client devices. <br><br>as far as speed goes, your home network is probably already faster than your home internet connection will be for some time to come so speed is a bad reason to change to "n"... <br><br>hope this helps.<br><small>--<br>Mobiledog, an old timer in wireless and mobile computers</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22455449</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:45:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22421397</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : Not necessary for mix B/G/N environments are not as worst as you might have thought in the past. Some WNPU chip sets don't play nice or function too well with other brands. Some have some wierd issues as well. That's how show what I mean but owning all 4 from different manufacturers I mixed results.<br><br>Atheros<br>Broadcom<br>Ranlink<br>Realtek<br><br>Worst one on the list above is Atheros chips I have nothing good to say about them. Broadcom, Realtek and Ranlink are just fine. Netgear and Linksys use Broadcom and Belkin Ranlink, Trendent Realtek in wireless adapters. Dlink and Trendent uses the Atheros more. That's where the WLAN and WWAN have the most issues.<br><br>Range and distance<br>Ranlink<br>Realtek<br><br>Steady Connection<br>Ranlink<br>Realtek<br><br>Prone to Overheating<br>Broadcom<br><br>Prone to DNS Replay Issues<br>Atheros<br><br>If you're needs in a router is wireless distance and range you might want to look at the Belkin N+.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22421397</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 09:06:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>theory or reality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/theory-or-reality-22395004</link>
<description><![CDATA[stenman posted : In theory the N router should handle G traffic but in real world tests the G traffic suffered significantly, often more than 50% in mixed environments, and this was worse if the router and the client hardware was from different vendors which is to be expected. The good news is that the client devices are relatively inexpensive. <br><br>A similar problem occurs with Ethernet when there is one computer with Jumbo frames enabled and others sharing the router or switch do not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/theory-or-reality-22395004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:48:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22055947</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : So yes Wireless N router can be used either G/N or just plain wired only..<br><br>G/N-WLAN/WWAN LAN/WAN 10/100/1000 Ports<br>1. DIR-655 A3/1.22B05 firmware<br>2. DIR-655 A4/1.22B05 firmware<br>3. WRT-310N (used with dd-wrt v24/sp2/11650 firmware)<br>4. WNR-854T <br><br>G/N-WLAN/WWAN LAN/WAN 10/100 Ports<br>3. TEW-652BP v1.01 (used with dir-615 c1/3.01 modded firmware)<br>4. WNR-834Bv2 (used with dd-wrt v24/sp2/11650 firmware)<br><br>Notes: <br><br>DD-WRT <br>WRT-310N and WNR-834Bv2 needs special firmware to first be installed. WNR-834Bv2 needs 11650mini.ck flashed first then 11650std.bin.  WRT-310N needs mini.bin then the std.bin flashed.<br><br>TEW-652BP stock firmware 1.10.8 it's okay but limited. So a header files was put onto the DIR-615 C1/3.01 firmware so you can flash the 652BRP to a DLINK firmware. So you have WAN port speed 10/auto/10/100/100 instead of not having that option. <br><br>This router it pron to heat so it has a bad case design where the air vents on the bottom. You would need to stand it up on it's side leaving the bottom part exposed.  Even though you can mount it on the wall the air vents would be blocked and causes the unit to over heat.<br><br>DD-WRT firmware is WIP (work in progress)<br>Latest firmware can be found here for DD-WRT<br>&raquo;<small>ftp</small>://<A HREF="ftp://dd-wrt.com/others/eko/V24_TNG/svn11650/">dd-wrt.com/others/eko/V24_TNG/svn11650/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22055947</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:48:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22037701</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : Well our ISP is the same so the UP speed is now more that what is offered. Another time would be to test as I am back on home base now. I was just accessing wireless he runs a Active Directory 2003 domain in the house. Soon after typing the above he lost the internet but the ISP was at fault this time..         ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22037701</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:23:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22036336</link>
<description><![CDATA[No_Strings posted : That shows the speed of his ISP - irrelevant.  Do some peer transfers and measure with Q-Check or some other throughput utility.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22036336</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:55:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22036244</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : Today I am off site at friends house using his wireless WRN-854T wireless N, been a a few hours still connected no drops in N.<br><br>Speed: TX: 150 Mbps / Rx:300 Mbps<br>Signal Strength: 80%<br>Link Quality: 100%<br><br>I use N at home about 98% is wireless N. Here with him 0% he's still running G even though he also has Linksys WRT-310N I just had installed the updated DD-WRT onto it. Going to use that as wireless drop or Hotspot. With my own N laptop I've been testing out some of his gear to see how well it performs are not. I ran some speedtest from my own..<br><br>Tested usng Wireless N<br> <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/425644410.png"> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22036244</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:33:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22030640</link>
<description><![CDATA[ccotton posted : FYI-  802.11n is still under draft development but WiFi Certified draft products are being sold.  802.11n is still being ratified. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22030640</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:15:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22015094</link>
<description><![CDATA[No_Strings posted : Ah, MIMO.  I thought you were talking about something else entirely - something unique to certain routers or specifically to N.  <br><br>Personally, if inter-node throughput was a big priority, I'd check Small Net Builder or Tom's Hardware to see how the unit performed before buying.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22015094</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:58:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22015061</link>
<description><![CDATA[ccbadd posted : I don't have any test data to link to just some protocol info:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/7131#toc0" >zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/7131#toc0</A><br><br>Here is a quote from the link that references the feature:<br><br>"The transmitting WLAN device actually splits a data stream into multiple parts, called spatial streams, and transmits each spatial stream through separate antennas to corresponding antennas on the receiving end. The current 802.11n draft provides for up to four spatial streams, even though compliant hardware is not required to support that many."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-22015061</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:51:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-21995497</link>
<description><![CDATA[No_Strings posted : That's good info.  Do you have any links to objective tests?  Specific models you recommend?  We can put them in the FAQ for reference.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-21995497</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 10:54:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-21995375</link>
<description><![CDATA[ccbadd posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/520919" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=520919');">No_Strings</a>:</small><br><br>Yes, that's what I'm saying.<br><br>If the hardware (CPU/RAM) of the G router is a bottleneck - that is, it can't process the bits quickly enough and the N router has more internal horsepower, then it's conceivable that you could see improvement.<br>...<br>In neither of those cases would the N spec in and of itself help.  A more robust G router would produce the same results.<br> </div>This is not true.  Draft N 2.0 with two or more antennas create spacial zones with full G speeds.  Look at it like two to four g routers back to back covering a 90 degree zone to fill all 360 degrees.  Each zone can send and receive concurrently with the other zones with no radio impact.  It's kind of like the move from hub's to switches with copper.  So, if the clients are connecting to different zones, they are not sharing airtime, therefore, performance IS increased.  The amount of increase will depend on the specs of the router, but most Draft N will perform much better then a G router.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-21995375</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 10:17:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-21988131</link>
<description><![CDATA[No_Strings posted : Yes, that's what I'm saying.<br><br>If the hardware (CPU/RAM) of the G router is a bottleneck - that is, it can't process the bits quickly enough and the N router has more internal horsepower, then it's conceivable that you could see improvement.<br><br>If the radio on the G router were so crappy or degraded that it was slowing things down due to retransmitted packets, then it's again conceivable that a new router could help.<br><br>In neither of those cases would the N spec in and of itself help.  A more robust G router would produce the same results.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-21988131</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:43:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Should I buy an &#x22;N&#x22; router?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-21987990</link>
<description><![CDATA[pdp76 posted : So are you saying that if I'm, for example getting 3Mbps when I'm simultaneously transferring between 2 wireless G clients through my current G router,I will also see 3Mbps when I do the same transfer with the same G clients through an N router? <br><br>edit: This is what I'm referring to "Adding an N router will not let you stream any faster between G clients"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Should-I-buy-an-N-router-21987990</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:16:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

