Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20602527 en Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:29:15 EDT Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:29:15 EDT Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20605649 cork1958 : This is about the same thing.

»www.antiphorm.com/page_software.htm
--
The Firefox alternative.
»www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20605649 Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:59:05 EDT Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20604930 funchords : I believe you (that you were told business customers won't be monitored).

I don't believe what you were told. Why not collect that additional fee for monitoring one more customer?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20604930 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:50:26 EDT Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20603316 benc :
said by Cable_Guy :

]This does not apply to Business customers. I work for the business department and we have been told the business accounts will be exempted from the monitoring.
Thank you very much for this information. I guess I really am getting some extra value for my money.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20603316 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:17:08 EDT Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20603295 benc :
said by dvd536 See Profile :

But theres no $ $ $ Money $ $ $ in opt-in.
So? I don't care. I send Charter more than enough. Shouldn't that be enough?

Wait, I'm on Charter Business. That's why my rates are high. But still, even on residential I suspect they still have a pretty good profit margin.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20603295 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:14:05 EDT Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20603278 benc :
said by knightmb See Profile :

If it is, see my signature. I've added a section for "user submitted" sites to help pollute the data they collect. If you can't fight them in court, fight them in the wallet and make all the data they collect useless and worthless. :D
Hmm...very interesting idea.

It sounds good, though now I'm wondering about something: How much data transfer is consumed each month?

Personally, I don't care. But people on TWC soon might.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20603278 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:11:52 EDT Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20603155 anon :
said by benc See Profile :

About this system:

I think it's no good, and yes it should be opt-in, with the default being no, instead of the other way around.

Now I'm wondering: Unlike most of their customers (probably), I get my HSI through their Business division.

I did that because some things are done differently. These things include:

- More liberal TOS.
- No port restrictions.
- No throttling.
- Static IP.

The downside? It's expensive for what you get.

I wonder, is my browsing history still sold to this company?
This does not apply to Business customers. I work for the business department and we have been told the business accounts will be exempted from the monitoring.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20603155 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:49:00 EDT Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20602630 dvd536 :
said by benc See Profile :

I think it's no good, and yes it should be opt-in, with the default being no, instead of the other way around.
But theres no $ $ $ Money $ $ $ in opt-in.
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20602630 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:55:19 EDT Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20602527 TamaraB :
said by knightmb See Profile :

... I've added a section for "user submitted" sites to help pollute the data they collect. ...
I use TrackMeNot on FireFox. Wouldn't it be a wonderful thing if Mozilla were to implement such a system as a defaulted on "option" right in their browsers?

Such a move from the open source community, would end this nonsense in a heartbeat.

Bob
--
Motor Vessel - Tamara B.
43' Long-Range Trawler
Cape Elizebeth ME.
See her Here.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20602527 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:37:46 EDT Re: Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20602205 knightmb :
said by benc See Profile :

About this system:

I think it's no good, and yes it should be opt-in, with the default being no, instead of the other way around.

Now I'm wondering: Unlike most of their customers (probably), I get my HSI through their Business division.

I did that because some things are done differently. These things include:

- More liberal TOS.
- No port restrictions.
- No throttling.
- Static IP.

The downside? It's expensive for what you get.

I wonder, is my browsing history still sold to this company?
If it is, see my signature. I've added a section for "user submitted" sites to help pollute the data they collect. If you can't fight them in court, fight them in the wallet and make all the data they collect useless and worthless. :D
--
Fight NebuAD and the like:
Click Here to pollute their data]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20602205 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:44:53 EDT Does this apply to "Business" customers? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20601795 benc : About this system:

I think it's no good, and yes it should be opt-in, with the default being no, instead of the other way around.

Now I'm wondering: Unlike most of their customers (probably), I get my HSI through their Business division.

I did that because some things are done differently. These things include:

- More liberal TOS.
- No port restrictions.
- No throttling.
- Static IP.

The downside? It's expensive for what you get.

I wonder, is my browsing history still sold to this company?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20601795 Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:36:44 EDT