<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Look at the contract in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20606040</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:13:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:13:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Look at the contract</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20612972</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/464718"><b>DivineDark</b></A> : when my car starts running on Latte ill start to get worried :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20612972</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:12:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Look at the contract</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20607328</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/614772"><b>jc100</b></A> : Agreed, HOWEVER the question begs to be answered. Did they hammer out the details regarding what constituted a full transition. By Starbuck's argument, they could market ATT in those areas where the transition had occurred without competing against T-Mobile and their agreement to them. I imagine this is one the lawyers will argue about and get rich over. In the end, it'll come down to a simple solution after millions were spent thinking of it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20607328</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:23:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Look at the contract</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20606040</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1458955"><b>S_engineer</b></A> : I agree to a point....the consumer contract is usually held to the point of extortion, with of course the most recent notable exception being mortgages should have never been agreed upon in the first place!<br><small>--<br>"Anything worth having is worth cheating for." WC Fields</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20606040</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:09:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Look at the contract</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20605955</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1514516"><b>Dogfather</b></A> : Maybe they'll get money but it seems these days contracts aren't worth the paper they're printed on and are always litigated into a half-assed settlement.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20605955</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:33:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Look at the contract</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20605945</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1458955"><b>S_engineer</b></A> : They will get plenty of dough.<br>You thought the price of gas was bad....how about 20.35 per gallon of Latte!<br><br>Does this mean the price of my wifes Latte will go up even further?<br><small>--<br>"Anything worth having is worth cheating for." WC Fields</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20605945</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:29:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Look at the contract</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20605877</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1514516"><b>Dogfather</b></A> : If T-Mobile was granted exclusivity, then they should get their dough.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20605877</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:08:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
