Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Rogers Starts Billing For Overages in July » More than fair...
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
69
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
pathetic. »
« Aside from the other issues involved...  
AuthorAll Replies


netgear
Restless Native
Premium
join:1999-12-20
Arlington, TX
More than fair...

Those are very reasonable caps and overages. Were TWRR to follow suit, I think reasonable people would be hard pressed to whine.

Good job, Rogers.


Huh

@rr.com

I wouldn't whine. I would call TW and say they can either get $150/month that I'm paying now for rr/HDcable/phone and waive all overage fees...or get $0 from me and I take my business elsewhere. $150 or $0. Seems pretty simple for them to make a decision. If they think my switching costs are high enough to prevent me from leaving they are stuck in 1999.


Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
·Colbanet


1 edit
reply to netgear
They don't seem reasonable to me.

My ISP provides, with my $30/mth DSL service (5mbit), 200GB transfer, overage charges of $0.25 per GB. I can also extend my cap by 100GB for $10/mth, or $0.10 per GB.

My ISP also measures your bandwidth usage as the average over the last two months to help users avoid getting charged for spikes in usage; they know that the usage spikes of individual users averages out over their multi-gigabit network, so it doesn't really hurt them to measure like that.

Now, my ISP is already charging me up to 10x cost (a 1000% markup) for that overage. I don't mind, though, because my ISP's prices and policies are reasonable. They deserve to make a bit of money.

Rogers, on the other hand, has got a ~16000% markup. To me, that is completely insane.

EDIT: I'll note that many major ISPs in Canada have had caps and overage charges for years now (5+ for some like Bell, though that was on and off), so it's not as big a deal up here.


netgear
Restless Native
Premium
join:1999-12-20
Arlington, TX
·AT&T DSL Service
·RoadRunner Cable

Bottom-line: I'm all for paying more, if I get more. It's to their advantage to improve their infrastructure when revenues increase. Improved infrastructure means improved services.

So, I'm all for paying more. I'm also for socking every lousy, thieving, bandwidth hog out there, who isn't willing to pay more, thereby improving the overall high-speed experience.



Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
Some people might call me a bandwidth hog for using 180GB in a month. Except... That's still under my cap, and doesn't even incur overage charges :P
Forums » Rogers Starts Billing For Overages in Julypathetic. »
« Aside from the other issues involved...  


Monday, 23-Nov 18:02:23 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [76] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [28] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [24] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [24] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [9] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [5] Monday Morning Links
· [5] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
Most people now reading
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Bell's Network Management practices page [TekSavvy]
· Extra charge to use Master Card instead of Visa? [General Questions]
· Firearms: Ammo question. [General Questions]
· Facebook Cures Depression [Canadian Chat]
· Which to get for fridge water line, plastic, steel or copper [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Best Bluray player [General Questions]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Sealing air ducts [Home Repair & Improvement]