site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
700
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

We'll see... especially if they move to metering....

Wonder how many people get UVerse for TV, or get it to get faster broadband...


Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
kudos:2

i going to be getting it for the 1.5mbps up

cable only has 1.0mbps

YES i will willing to switch for .5 mbps more up


bfreese

join:2003-08-18
Wadsworth, IL

Now if only they would improve that pesky latency I would actually get it...



en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

reply to KrK
Yeah - metering may be a deal breaker if I ever want service.
On a 3Mbps plan, I would expect no less than 60GB/month
6Mbps plan, no less than 150GB/month
10Mbps, no less than 300GB/month as 'reasonable' caps.
Eg. 95% should never hit them.. yet.

A 3Mbps plan could theretically pass through 1TB of data/month.
--
Canada = Hollywood North



Hookem99
Deep In The Heart

join:2007-07-18
Pflugerville, TX
kudos:1
Reviews:
·ViaTalk

reply to KrK
Im having Uverse installed tomorrow. I was only interested in HSI, but was talked into the TV side for the free install. Ill try the TV for a month for free, but I dont see them competing with Directv at this point, especially in the HD department. Only time will tell!!
--
There never was a curse, the Red Sox really did SUCK for 86 years!!



BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to KrK
Well maybe I took it wrong, but I'm pretty sure at&t was talking about metering service for DSL not Uverse. Perhaps they meant both.



indianapoolis

@63.87.167.x

reply to KrK
I live in a Uverse area... and still don't know anybody that has it.

I already have the DSL, but invested in HD receivers for DirecTv...

So that will keep me from moving over, even if the speeds are incredibly faster.


alfnoid
Premium,MVM
join:2002-02-18

reply to BF69

said by BF69:

Well maybe I took it wrong, but I'm pretty sure at&t was talking about metering service for DSL not Uverse. Perhaps they meant both.
The internet portion of Uverse IS DSL so expect it there too.

ATT was bitching about backbone capacity being used up and not making any more money for it.
That is the excuse they gave to be looking into metering so no matter what the delivery to the end user will be as far as DSL or fiber or wireless of some kind...it will all hit the backbone at some point.

starfighter

join:2000-12-11
Valencia, CA

reply to KrK
Getting a stable tv and internet signal was our motivation. Getting a tv signal that was visibly superior even on our old analog sets, an internet signal whose speeds never varied more than a few percent, and a system that stayed functional even when thunderstorms rolled over the area were bonuses we did not expect, but are enough to keep us on U-verse and away from TW cable.


Wednesday, 30-May 19:06:13 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics