Tweak
Premium
join:2002-06-08
Oklahoma City, OK
 ·Cox HSI
3 edits | reply to en102
Re: When will AT&T
It's because At&t focus is television not broadband if they wanted every one to have up to 25 megabits they could easily. The problem is they have a personal grudge against cable company's. When they see a cable company taking away their bread and butter land lines they want to go for cables bread and butter television service.
I guess it all breaks down to money. Apparently to AT&T the demand is an alternative to cable or Satellite tv, even if the market is saturated with video providers. U verse is AT&Ts lame attempt to compete with cable television, its not about bringing broadband to new people or expanding speeds, its about video. |
|
EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA | It isn't some strange hatred of cable- television is way more profitable than internet service, even with carriage fees. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | I tend to agree... Cable companies, however offer Internet and VoIP only packages, while Telco does not... even though Telco has been primarily DSL+POTS for many years.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA
| Telco = at&t in this case, I presume...
There was a post in an earlier thread that claimed there were union problems between U-Verse installers and DSL installers that prevented TV-free U-Verse from being sold, though I don't know how accurate that really is. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
| Pretty accurate.
I'm on DSL-Extreme, and they are not allowed to resell any portion of Uverse, and even require DSL to be installed with POTS line (per AT&T)
AT&T isn't publically selling TV-free Uverse unless its a 'business' (BBR has an article) and charges more.
I've been able to have AT&T over the phone sell me TV free Uverse, but they also told me that I could keep my existing DSL running at the same time. 
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
