<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: so? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20655748</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:52:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:52:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20655748</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  PhoenixDown <A HREF="/useremail/u/823721"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I agree - large deals usually have specific rates, terms and SLA's, this isn't anything new.<br> </div>Yeah, definitely not a big deal.  Contracts to purchase a service en masse usually has some pretty nice perks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20655748</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:09:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20636687</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Only 15,000? Try closer to 150,000 and that would be just in the Washington DC metro area.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20636687</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:47:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20636614</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/505827"><b>GlobalMind</b></A> : Exactly and any large org could have the same arrangement with Sprint when you deal in that type of volume.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20636614</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:04:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633486</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>GOLFnSUN</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  rf_engineer <A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Furthermore, if you're a taxpayer you would end up paying the ETFs anyway.  If anything, this is a good thing.<br><br>Slow news day?<br> </div>You have to keep the peanut gallery revved up by giving them their daily anti-corporate feeding.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633486</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:55:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633467</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>GOLFnSUN</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  PhoenixDown <A HREF="/useremail/u/823721"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I agree - large deals usually have specific rates, terms and SLA's, this isn't anything new.<br> </div>You are right. The bigger the contract, the more likely will the telco be to make favorable conditions part of the deal. Of course this is std business practice for all contracts. The biggest businesses also get similar deals.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633467</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:51:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633465</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : Furthermore, if you're a taxpayer you would end up paying the ETFs anyway.  If anything, this is a good thing.<br><br>Slow news day?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633465</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:51:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633384</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/823721"><b>PhoenixDown</b></A> : I agree - large deals usually have specific rates, terms and SLA's, this isn't anything new.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633384</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:37:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>so?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633367</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1473279"><b>teleblender</b></A> : so what? if you had even a fraction of the lines the gvt does, say 15,000 with sprint, i bet they would let you add and drop lines as your needs changed without etf too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20633367</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:34:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
