republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


pspcrazy
Anime Freak

join:2008-02-06
San Diego, CA

1 edit

reply to fAcEtIOUs

Re: Great, More Ammo For The Cap Arguments

said by fAcEtIOUs:

Guess what - 95% of the people aren't fine with that. Only those on the very high end of bandwidth use want everyone's rates raised so they can download more than everyone else.
Has anyone noticed from like 1 month ago there's been like 2-3 posters who have just kept saying caps are essential, without caps the internet will die, or caps are awesome? Oddly these posters have began posting like this just recently when the corporations started to think that cap's are needed. It's almost as if they've been planted to shift the way users think about caps (it's not working either). I've never heard these posters ever say anything negative about caps, nor agree with anyone on anything logical behind not capping.

Just something I noticed that I thought was odd.


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

said by pspcrazy See ProfileHas anyone noticed from like 1 month ago there's been like 2-3 posters who have just kept saying caps are essential, without caps the internet will die, or caps are awesome? [b :

Oddly these posters have began posting like this just recently [/b]
Do a search on my ID and you will see I have been posting caps and bill-by-byte for over a year now.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


MysticGogeta
The Robot Devil
Premium
join:2005-03-14
League City, TX

I don't fully agree with caps the idea makes sense but the problem would be the future development of infrastructure. Once there able to meet the demands the execs and CEO's are going to sit back and rake in the money and laugh in disbelief, that this plan actually went through.
What I find interesting is company's that are going through with caps or in testing (Such as TWC) It will probally weed out the bandwidth hogs and they will flock to another provider. Just think for a moment do you think the savings on their end will be passed onto you as a lower rate? They will take our money and come up with another way of charging more , such as making you pay for access to certain websites (Youtube,Google, etc)
Don't you remember there was a few providers a while back trying to get them to pay them. What do you think they are working on now?
--
Team Discovery-Join the fight


Thursday, 31-May 00:06:47 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics