mc3
join:2000-08-06
Lake Mary, FL
1 edit | reply to rickd2
Re: Sprint Broadband Direct - and the ALLEGED FCC Mandate. heh, so you're going to attempt to tarnish a companies reputation with malice over something you have no way of verifying? .. "countersuit" .. |
|
rickd2
join:2008-06-10
Colorado Springs, CO | Negative. I never said there was no verification. You did.
I said that I have been on and off the phone with the FCC now for several days, I've written letters to them, and they state quite clearly there is no mandate.
I don't have to do a thing to 'tarnish a company's' reputation, they have managed to do so themselves. Lying about this is sufficient. |
|
|
|
| Sprint is using MMDS frequencies for the downstream 2.5 - 2.7 Ghz and MDS 2.1 Ghz for the upstream, The MMDS frequencies were transition to EBS (educational broadband service) and BRS (Broadband Radio Service) by the FCC and the MDS was transition to AWS (advance wireless services). Sprint retained their licenses and leases for the new EBS and BRS channel plans but not the AWS bands. It was my impression that the new license holder of the AWS bands were supposed to pay for the incumbent expense for transitioning. The FCC may have ruled otherwise which would explain the turning off the networks.
Webhiway Communications is giving Sprint customers help in the transition.
»wispassoc.com/news/Webhiway-Comm···g-Sprint |
|
