| reply to Cabal
Re: Love FF i agree very fast |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
Using the IE tab option for a website built specifically for Mozilla browsers doesn't seem like it is going to help.
I find it amazing that a website interface for Mozilla/Firefox works fine with FF2 but breaks with FF3. |
|
| said by soccerguy:Using the IE tab option for a website built specifically for Mozilla browsers doesn't seem like it is going to help. I find it amazing that a website interface for Mozilla/Firefox works fine with FF2 but breaks with FF3. It worked just fine for me. I opened my.live.com with the IE Tab addon and it looks identical to what it looks like in IE7.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
| That's all fine and dandy, but I'm not talking about live.com, a Microsoft site. I'm talking about a website (webmail from an ISP to be more specific) that was built and coded specifically for users with a Mozilla/FF browser. It works fine in FF2, but chokes in FF3. That just makes no sense.
And what does it say about Mozilla if we are forced to use an "IE" add-on to make web pages render correctly? |
|
wierdo
join:2001-02-16
Tulsa, OK Reviews:
 ·Cox HSI
 ·T-Mobile US
| said by soccerguy:That's all fine and dandy, but I'm not talking about live.com, a Microsoft site. I'm talking about a website (webmail from an ISP to be more specific) that was built and coded specifically for users with a Mozilla/FF browser. It works fine in FF2, but chokes in FF3. That just makes no sense. And what does it say about Mozilla if we are forced to use an "IE" add-on to make web pages render correctly? If it was written to standards, it would work, unless there's some bug, in which case you should file a bug report.
--
It's wierdo, not weirdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word.  |
|
| reply to tbone2006
Use "IE Tab" add on for firefox. |
|
 MichailPremium
join:2000-08-02
Boynton Beach, FL
kudos:1 | reply to Jeffrey
said by Jeffrey:I got right on » www.mozilla.com last night around 6pm with no problem, and downloaded FF in a matter of seconds. Although later on in the evening 8 or 9pm EST or so, mozilla.com had trouble resolving. Not sure what that was about. I think this is the first time in history - my history that is - where I downloaded, installed, and used a brand new release of a program on its first day. I did that with Vista. It was fun to see no updates after a clean install.
I've been running the FF 3 RC for a while. I never saw an update but it seems to have dropped the RC off the version. |
|
 jonnyzPremium
join:2003-03-20
Canfield, OH | reply to wierdo
Obviously you don't care about older sites that haven't been maintained for some time but are still useful to some of us...
--
Join the RC5 team. |
|
wierdo
join:2001-02-16
Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·Cox HSI
·T-Mobile US
| said by jonnyz:Obviously you don't care about older sites that haven't been maintained for some time but are still useful to some of us... I do. That's why I have IE. It deals better with quasi-web sites. Fx deals better with web sites.
--
It's wierdo, not weirdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word. |
|
| reply to Jeffrey
They really did a good job from start to release!
I have FF3 installed on my laptop.
The download and the installation was quick.
Fast browser!
--
"Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a nightmare." (-Japanese Proverb) |
|
