site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·WISP Forum FAQ ·WISP Directory ·Radio Mobile
AuthorAll Replies

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to superdog

Re: Limiting Torrent, eMule etc...

Superdog, there's also this company called Astaro They do a lot of biz stuff, not packet shaping really (don't like the term but that's basically what NetEq does in a very benign way if you ask me) but all the "all types of restrictions" stuff...

About the whole dual-WAN setup, do you think that setting up BGP ahead of the NetEq between two providers (as I've said I'll probably be getting McBandwidth in a large amount and then some premium stuff to back it up and so people can access certain sites with even lower latency) would allow for a disproportionate dual connection to work? And no I don't know much to anything about BGP yet. It would be something like 100 Mbps on one side and 10-20 on the other, eventually.

And if you're wondering where I'm gonna get the money for 100 Mbps, remember that Cogent will sell it to me for $600 a month And their network doesn't seem too bad either.

Bigpaddy_Irl

join:2005-12-12
Ireland

I too have a Netequalier unit. Its between my v2 server and my first 5.8Ghz backhhaul AP. I only have a 10Mb feed and thought i would need to be increasing it until I bought this unit. Now I reckon I will be able to handle twice as much subscribers with the same 10Mb feed. It was all the file sharing users whom were doing the harm, not bandwidth wise, but opening up hundreds of connections on each AP thus slowing down the AP and everyone elses connection.
I have to say im happy, it really is just 'Plug & Play'.


Thursday, 31-May 00:11:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics