gatorkram
Spelling and Grammer impared
Premium
join:2002-07-22
Winterville, NC
clubs:
 ·Embarq
 ·linode
1 edit | reply to SilverSurfer
Re: Copyright violation
said by SilverSurfer  :said by gatorkram :I create my click data, so it is mine. If the ISP tries to do anything with it, then they violate my copyright. I understand that you think your clickdata belongs to you, but it's not a copyright and neither you nor anyone else will be able to use that argument. Clickdata is a privacy issue, not one for the copyright office. It's %100 unique and created by me, what else would you call something you can copyright?
edit: more text
No one seems to care about privacy online these days, but every time you turn around some huge group is crying about their copyrights being violated, so I figured maybe I'd join them.
--
Give me bandwidth or give me death!
»/testhistory/661871/4f240 |
|
major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:
| said by gatorkram :It's %100 unique and created by me, what else would you call something you can copyright? edit: more text No one seems to care about privacy online these days, but every time you turn around some huge group is crying about their copyrights being violated, so I figured maybe I'd join them. Beautiful fantasy you've got going on there, but no court in the country is going to assign you a copyright for clickstream data because it is not considered a fixed medium.
You'd have to go pretty far up in the food chain to get a judge to render a decision that makes it so, and, somehow, I don't ever see that happening.
--
The Toll
Tracking Lord Stanley
|
|
GlobalMind
Domino Dude, POWER Systems Guy
Premium
join:2001-10-29
Hollywood, FL
2 edits | said by major marco somehow, I don't ever see that happening.
The thing that's rather annoying is that the ISP seems to think they own the data, so someone CAN claim ownership. Just a question of what stands up.
I still say the more annoying part is that they could be or are modifying web site code on its way back to the requestor and it is that part I think is highly objectionable. |
|
