R0CKY
TSI Rocky
Premium,VIP
join:2005-05-19
Chatham, ON
|  CRTC answers Bell's non-disclosure stance!
Well gang,
Here's it is!
The CRTC has just issued another procedure letter regarding our request for Bell to disclose certain information. The Commission has decided that Bell
"must" disclose the information publicly and they have also realigned the filing dates for subsequent comments.
Rocky
--
TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
Angelo_
The Network Guy
Premium
join:2002-06-18 | nice Rocky =p |
|
sMURF
join:2007-02-27
Toronto, ON | reply to R0CKY
Haha, suck it Bell. |
|
HiVolt
30
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
clubs: | reply to R0CKY
Awesome work!!!!! BUCK FELL!
--
,,!,,('-'),,!,, |
|
moezie
join:2004-04-05
Vaudreuil-Dorion, QC | reply to R0CKY
hip, hip, hooray!!!!  |
|
j3richo
join:2007-12-08
Gatineau, QC | time for a celebration |
|
pablo2525
join:2003-06-23
1 edit | reply to R0CKY
Very well done.
I continue to support TekSavvy.
I've moved all my three phone lines to TekSavvy and DSL of course is provided by TekSavvy. |
|
R0CKY
TSI Rocky
Premium,VIP
join:2005-05-19
Chatham, ON
| Appreciate it.... Though, this is about something that's very major!
The CRTC is turning over a very nice new leaf! They're considering Net Neutrality needs (stated publicly by the head honcho from the CRTC recently) and also are making a very real stance (today) on a topic that will shape our Internet future!
........very cool!
--
TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
Gnaraktol
join:2008-03-18
Gatineau, QC | I am quite happy to see this roll by, and i agree with you Rocky 100%
This is a reward from all that effort yourself, CAIP and your company has been making, without people like you, this would never have gotten to where it is now!
Gratz! |
|
midnighter
join:2007-09-22
Etobicoke, ON
| reply to R0CKY
I have been following the Bell vs. 3rd party DSL providers somewhat but am not fully aware of the situation. Can you elaborate what this decisions means for you, Bell and Teksavvy users such as myself.
Thanks again for repping your clients proudly and vocally Rocky. Keep up the fight. |
|
tertech
join:2008-04-12
Ottawa, ON | reply to R0CKY
Am I the only one who can't open that link?  |
|
andyb
Premium
join:2003-05-29
SW Ontario | click save as and add .pdf to it. |
|
tertech
join:2008-04-12
Ottawa, ON | Thanks, that did the trick |
|
milnoc
join:2001-03-05
H2Z
 ·TekSavvy Solutions..
| reply to tertech
Do a "Save As..." and add the .pdf extension to the file name. You'll be able to open it properly afterwards.
Nice little victory! Depending on what I find in the newly released data, I may have to send another letter to the CRTC...  |
|
Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
1 edit | reply to R0CKY
Hmm, we're barely getting anything here.
The CRTC has only demanded that three specific redacted things be revealed. The vast majority of things here will remain "confidential". |
|
R0CKY
TSI Rocky
Premium,VIP
join:2005-05-19
Chatham, ON
| reply to midnighter
said by midnighter  :I have been following the Bell vs. 3rd party DSL providers somewhat but am not fully aware of the situation. Can you elaborate what this decisions means for you, Bell and Teksavvy users such as myself. Thanks again for repping your clients proudly and vocally Rocky. Keep up the fight. Here's the link for everything:
»www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/···5153.htm
Here's what Bell answered, but without much of anything in it.
»www.crtc.gc.ca/public/partvii/20···1084.zip
--
TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
R0CKY
TSI Rocky
Premium,VIP
join:2005-05-19
Chatham, ON
| reply to Guspaz
said by Guspaz :Hmm, we're barely getting anything here. The CRTC has only demanded that three specific redacted things be revealed. The vast majority of things here will remain "confidential". I think, if we need more information, and can justify why, they'll give us more!
--
TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
coming out
@videotron.ca
| reply to R0CKY
Full article/CRTC rulling @ »www.p2pnet.net/story/16155
Addressed to Bell mouthperson Mirko ‘5%’ Bibic:
"Unless otherwise expressly indicated, Bell Canada is to place on the public record all of the information specified in the Attachment by 23 June 2008, serving a copy on CAIP by the same date. These submissions must be received, not merely sent, by that date."
=======
haha "Mirko ‘5%’ Bibic" his new nick name LOL |
|
midnighter
join:2007-09-22
Etobicoke, ON
| reply to R0CKY
So they have to reveal this information that Bell considers to be confidential. What will happen once they reveal it? Will throttling stop? I don't quite understand how revealing this information will solve the throttling issues. Thanks for putting up with my noob questions |
|
Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
·Colbanet
| reply to R0CKY
said by R0CKY :said by Guspaz :Hmm, we're barely getting anything here. The CRTC has only demanded that three specific redacted things be revealed. The vast majority of things here will remain "confidential". I think, if we need more information, and can justify why, they'll give us more! But CAIP asked for and tried to justify most of the redacted information, and only got these bits. There would have to be a substantially different argument used the second time around to request disclosure of the same information previously rejected. |
|
