Maynard G Krebs
@teksavvy.com
| The CRTC didn't go far enough
The CRTC should have also ordered that CAIP (the complainant in this matter) should be allowed to install their own monitoring equipment (or contracted with an independent 3rd party eg. IBM or HP consulting divisions) for 30 days at up to 10 locations of their own choosing within Bell's network to verify the accuracy of Bell's numbers. | |
|
 
joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: The CRTC didn't go far enough said by Maynard G Krebs :
The CRTC should have also ordered that CAIP (the complainant in this matter) should be allowed to install their own monitoring equipment (or contracted with an independent 3rd party eg. IBM or HP consulting divisions) for 30 days at up to 10 locations of their own choosing within Bell's network to verify the accuracy of Bell's numbers.
Why is there any reason to assume any of the parties are acting in bad faith before the data even being disclosed?
--
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0 | |
|
 | 
a333
A hot cup of integrals please
join:2007-06-12
Rego Park, NY | Re: The CRTC didn't go far enough Knowing Bell, HELL yes!!! | |
|
| 
mazhurg
Premium
join:2004-05-02
Portage La Prairie, MB | Bell Canada Pointy haired guys = Jim Prentice = Real Honest people! | |
|
| |
| 
rec9140
Provoice just DO it
join:2003-07-29
Mulberry, FL
| said by joako  :
Why is there any reason to assume any of the parties are acting in bad faith before the data even being disclosed?
Corporate Ethics 101 in 2008, thats why.
The lips are moving on the suits mouths, means the lies and BS are flowing!
Any data released is going to follow the simple rule:
You can make statistics say anything you want.
Even more so with business trick, er, operating procedure #1a bury agencies, the public, and watchdog groups in enough paper they probably won't find what they need before the deadline.
I am for an all out geek guerrilla raid on Bell and any other ISP pulling this crap and have a good beat down on some execs.
--
Lorem ipsum ei pro stet equidem labores, at enim animal expetenda nec. Ea vix argumentum dissentiunt, usu esse ridens ex./ / Ban all copyright, trademarks, and IP laws! | |
|
|
|
|
·