<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: No problem complying means they will show congestion in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20674825</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:07:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:07:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: No problem complying means they will show congestion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674825</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : If you've been following this issue, the throttling of third party ISP's has already been proven to not be a congestion issue-- they pay for their own bandwidth.  Bell's just throttling the last mile.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674825</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:06:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No problem complying means they will show congestion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674793</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/633187"><b>DataRiker</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If Bell sees no problem complying with the order, then that means the data they will supply will absolutely show congestion.<br> </div>I will not go into the merits of your childish conclusion, but I think it is exactly what makes us honest people worry. I also have absolutely no doubt they will show congestion. I also have no doubt that the statistical data released will be completely unverifiable.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674793</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:01:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: No problem complying means they will show congestion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674267</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464133"><b>a333</b></A> : And we all know that Bell's new music store service, along with its speed updates, are a result of congestion... right.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674267</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:12:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>No problem complying means they will show congestion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20673981</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : If Bell sees no problem complying with the order, then that means the data they will supply will absolutely show congestion. And that will cut off at the knees those complaining about throttling being an anti-competitive action instead of a network management action.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20673981</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:21:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
