<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: The CRTC didn&#x27;t go far enough in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20674830</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:48:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:48:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: The CRTC didn&#x27;t go far enough</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20676389</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/848934"><b>rec9140</b></A> :  <blockquote><small>said by  joako <A HREF="/useremail/u/198350"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><hr>Why is there any reason to assume any of the parties are acting in bad faith before the data even being disclosed?<br> <hr></blockquote><br><br>Corporate Ethics 101 in 2008, thats why.<br><br>The lips are moving on the suits mouths, means the lies and BS are flowing!<br><br>Any data released is going to follow the simple rule:<br><br>You can make statistics say anything you want.<br><br>Even more so with business trick, er, operating procedure #1a bury agencies, the public, and watchdog groups in enough paper they probably won't find what they need before the deadline. <br><br>I am for an all out geek guerrilla raid on Bell and any other ISP pulling this crap and have a good beat down on some execs.<br><small>--<br>Lorem ipsum ei pro stet equidem labores, at enim animal expetenda nec. Ea vix argumentum dissentiunt, usu esse ridens ex./ / Ban all copyright, trademarks, and IP laws!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20676389</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:51:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The CRTC didn&#x27;t go far enough</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20675246</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243195"><b>fatness</b></A> : Question<div class="bquote"><small>said by  joako <A HREF="/useremail/u/198350"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Why is there any reason to assume any of the parties are acting in bad faith before the data even being disclosed?<br> </div>An answer<br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  a333 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1464133"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>And we all know that Bell's new music store service, along with its speed updates, are a result of congestion... right.<br> </div><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.livescience.com/animals/071218-monkey-call.html">Female monkeys often utter loud, distinctive calls before, during or after sex.<a>.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20675246</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:53:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The CRTC didn&#x27;t go far enough</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20675180</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1000066"><b>mazhurg</b></A> : Bell Canada Pointy haired guys = Jim Prentice = Real Honest people!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20675180</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:34:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The CRTC didn&#x27;t go far enough</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674884</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464133"><b>a333</b></A> : Knowing Bell, HELL yes!!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674884</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:20:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The CRTC didn&#x27;t go far enough</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674830</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/198350"><b>joako</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Maynard G Krebs :</small><br><br>The CRTC should have also ordered that CAIP (the complainant in this matter) should be allowed to install their own monitoring equipment (or contracted with an independent 3rd party eg. IBM or HP consulting divisions) for 30 days at up to 10 locations of their own choosing within Bell's network to verify the accuracy of Bell's numbers.<br> </div>Why is there any reason to assume any of the parties are acting in bad faith before the data even being disclosed?<br><small>--<br>09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674830</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:07:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The CRTC didn&#x27;t go far enough</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674393</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <br>The CRTC should have also ordered that CAIP (the complainant in this matter) should be allowed to install their own monitoring equipment (or contracted with an independent 3rd party eg. IBM or HP consulting divisions) for 30 days at up to 10 locations of their own choosing within Bell's network to verify the accuracy of Bell's numbers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20674393</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:36:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
