http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20675614 en Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:33:06 EDT Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:33:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20675614 milnoc : It may not be a "court order" per se, but the CRTC can definitely issue "orders."]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20675614 Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:38:56 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20673984 Guspaz : 1) The document wasn't confidential, just heavily redacted
2) The CRTC did not order Bell to reveal all of it, just three particular redacted sections
3) The CRTC is not a court, there is no "court order".]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20673984 Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:22:09 EDT