2 edits | Bell LOSES EITHER way no if they prove congestion to the degree where they must shape to 5% of speed they were contractually obliged then it actually doesn't cut off at the knees anything.
In fact it gives positive proof for ANY class action lawsuit to prove they were grossly negligent and KNEW before hand that when you signed a contract that they could not fullfil it
Then it becomes what does 384Kbit cost on average aorund the world versus the cost that each user on the bell network pays.
Then damages to that minus lawyer fee.
AND if they have say 6 million customers and have to pay back 1000 to each customer or even 500. That is from 3 billion to 6 billion.....
So in effect they could bumble this and let caip win or get mauled in some serious civil actions.
Ya think what the choice will be?
Also it wold prove that bell stole canadian tax payer funds to build a network that it did not and that might even lead to some action by the gov't to recoup monies invested.
P.S. in effect it gives caip back what it paid for ( the cheaper option to bell and sympatico can shape its own people until they have no customers OR get at building that network up - going from 5 megabit accoutnsales to 7megabit also seems a bit stupid ) |
|
| WTF?
I'm so confused! |
|
| reply to chronoss2008
go back to your cave osama |
|
|
|
