republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


NetAdmin1
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

reply to MrSpock29

Re: .

said by MrSpock29:

When the country was founded, the Fed. gov't was supposed to provide basic fundamental services, like delivering the mail, national defense, and the Treasury, to name a few.
Maybe there are just too many gov't services that require funding.
Before the 16th amendment, there were no Fed. taxes. When they were implemented, it was 1% for all.
This is a state tax...
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...

MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ

said by NetAdmin1:

said by MrSpock29:

When the country was founded, the Fed. gov't was supposed to provide basic fundamental services, like delivering the mail, national defense, and the Treasury, to name a few.
Maybe there are just too many gov't services that require funding.
Before the 16th amendment, there were no Fed. taxes. When they were implemented, it was 1% for all.
This is a state tax...
Yes, of course it is.


NetAdmin1
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

said by MrSpock29:

said by NetAdmin1:

This is a state tax...
Yes, of course it is.
The only reason I mentioned it was because you were talking about the federal government and federal taxes...
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...


jgkolt
Premium
join:2004-02-21
Lakewood, OH

plus how prominent was telephones when the country was formed ehhhhh. maybe thats why you didnt see them mentioning telephone with mail and national defense.
--
Learning how to invest? Sign up to get 3 free trades for you and for me each. PM me


MrSpock29

join:2008-02-09
Hammonton, NJ

reply to NetAdmin1

said by NetAdmin1:

said by MrSpock29:

said by NetAdmin1:

This is a state tax...
Yes, of course it is.
The only reason I mentioned it was because you were talking about the federal government and federal taxes...
I know, but I took the comment I was responding too as a generalization, and not really just about this tax. In fact, I took both comments that way. But I think there is a point made there in either instance.

bicker

join:2007-05-10
Burlington, MA

reply to MrSpock29
The point is that our Founding Fathers limited the extent to which the federal government could tax, so as to leave the rest of context for the states.


degauss1

join:2001-07-02
Hillsboro, OR

reply to NetAdmin1

said by NetAdmin1:

This is a state tax...
No, it appears it's a bunch of cities levying taxes.

Isn't this type of payment usually part of a franchise agreement in order to use the ROW on those poles?

Sounds like cities getting greedy to me.

Wednesday, 30-May 21:37:28 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics