Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » IPv6 » ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?
Uniqs:
1303
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
« IPV6 as tunnle for more IPV4 URLs?  
ajmas

join:2008-04-14
Canada


1 edit

ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

I am trying to update the following page on ISPs providing IPv6 addresses to their customers:

»https://www.sixxs.net/wiki/IPv6_Enabled_···roviders

Does anyone know whether there are others not on the list that could be added?

BTW the page is not for tunnel listing tunnel providers.

justbits
More fiber than ATT can handle
Premium
join:2003-01-08
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Midwest

Re: ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

How about adding a 6to4 list too?
Several providers have 6to4, although some go through non-optimal paths. (AT+T DSL in my area goes through Sweden.

Sprint supposedly has IPv6 routing, but I don't know if they offer it to customers or not.
»sprintv6.net/aspath/bgp.html
»www.sprintv6.net/Sprintv6.html
"Sprint is currently working on its product offering to include a native dual-stack support for Dedicated IP Access, planned to debut in early 2008."
ajmas

join:2008-04-14
Canada

Re: ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

It could be added, but I would rather see 6to4 on a separate page. The general idea of the page is to list ISPs providing IPv6 without requiring customers to do extra work. Basically this would help anyone wanting to find an ISP which provides 'native' IPv6 support.

The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page.

visitor

join:2001-07-26
Manchester, CT

Re: ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?

said by ajmas See Profile :

The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page.
I agree the ISP's that support a 6to4 environment should be added to a different page then ISP's that support dual stack handoff to the CPE.

In Connecticut,USA I've seen that www.netplex.net has advertised a /32 but I don't know if they are providing v6 addresses to their customers.

»www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-r···=2.0&v=6
Forums » Up and Running » IPv6« IPV6 as tunnle for more IPV4 URLs?  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 20:14:01 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [67] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [55] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [46] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [39] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [35] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [30] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [30] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [24] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
Most people now reading
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [Internet] Gaming problem for "Heroes of Newerth" ( New bell Upd [Bell Canada]
· Ooma changing features [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Phish] email from CDC "personal vaccination profile" [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· UBB round 2 at the CRTC [Canadian Broadband]