justbits
More fiber than ATT can handle
Premium
join:2003-01-08
Chicago, IL
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to ajmas
Re: ISPs providing IPv6 to customers?
How about adding a 6to4 list too?
Several providers have 6to4, although some go through non-optimal paths. (AT+T DSL in my area goes through Sweden.
Sprint supposedly has IPv6 routing, but I don't know if they offer it to customers or not.
»sprintv6.net/aspath/bgp.html
»www.sprintv6.net/Sprintv6.html
"Sprint is currently working on its product offering to include a native dual-stack support for Dedicated IP Access, planned to debut in early 2008." |
|
ajmas
join:2008-04-14
Canada
| It could be added, but I would rather see 6to4 on a separate page. The general idea of the page is to list ISPs providing IPv6 without requiring customers to do extra work. Basically this would help anyone wanting to find an ISP which provides 'native' IPv6 support.
The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page. |
|
visitor
join:2001-07-26
Manchester, CT
| said by ajmas  :The other issue I have with certain 6to4 solutions is that they fail when presented with an IPv4 NAT, which many home users have. sixxs.net, Teredo and Gateway 6 (on Windows) all support NAT traversal. As I said all this could be added to another page. I agree the ISP's that support a 6to4 environment should be added to a different page then ISP's that support dual stack handoff to the CPE.
In Connecticut,USA I've seen that www.netplex.net has advertised a /32 but I don't know if they are providing v6 addresses to their customers.
»www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-r···=2.0&v=6 |
|
