<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Isn&#x27;t This Based On EVDO-A? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20690618</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:48:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:48:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Isn&#x27;t This Based On EVDO-A?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20697672</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Even if they got to 3 Mb/s per plane, that's just not enough.  Sure, it'll do text email, but that's about it.  You want to watch a video, even YouTube?: fuhgetaboutit.<br><br>I remember some news a while back about Harris working on a system with a California company to do about 30 Mb/s per plane.  That sounds much cooler...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20697672</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Isn&#x27;t This Based On EVDO-A?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20690668</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  expert007 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1312014"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If so, then isn't 3.0 per subscriber (which would really be the airplane) exceedingly optimistic?? <br><br>Will be interesting to see how the handoffs between towers are handled.<br><br>Does anyone know if these are simply cell antennas mounted facing upward? <br> </div>They claim it is a specially modified form of Rev A that can get that 3 mbps speed.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://gigaom.com/2008/03/11/gogo-inflight-broadband/" >gigaom.com/2008/03/11/gogo-infli&middot;&middot;&middot;oadband/</A><br><div class="bquote">The technology being used for radio transmissions is a customized version of Qualcomm&#8217;s EV-DO Rev A technology. Blumenstein said that they can migrate to Rev B or LTE if and when those higher-speed technologies become available. The base stations for the system come from ZTE Corp., the Chinese telecom hardware vendor that is desperately trying to make a name for itself in the U.S. market. Aircell is using technology developed by Meru Networks to ensure that the on-board systems don&#8217;t run into capacity issues and all passengers can connect with the on-board 802.11 routers.<br><br>Aircell expects to deploy about 500 antennas, enough to cover the entire country and support as many as 250,000 broadband users.</div><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20690668</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:38:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Isn&#x27;t This Based On EVDO-A?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20690618</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1312014"><b>expert007</b></A> : If so, then isn't 3.0 per subscriber (which would really be the airplane) exceedingly optimistic?? <br><br>Will be interesting to see how the handoffs between towers are handled.<br><br>Does anyone know if these are simply cell antennas mounted facing upward? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20690618</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:29:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
