<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Which numbers are relevant? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20693236</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:43:04 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:43:04 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Which numbers are relevant?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20693236</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1349487"><b>Jahntassa</b></A> : Okay, so they separated the numbers by where the congestion happened on what part of the networks. Is there anything besides the DSLAM that would affect the independents?<br><br>They show it as a percentage of connections that are congested, but without a base number that doesn't really help. 5% of what? 10? 20? 1,000?<br><br>I guess I can see the congestion on the one part of the network, but doesn't that suggest that they should work on, perhaps, expanding that part of their network?<br><br>Also, did they throttle themselves?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20693236</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:39:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
