| reply to NetAdmin1
Re: Graphs said by NetAdmin1:said by fAcEtIOUs:The data they are supplying is going to convince politicians and bureaucrats and not other network engineers. Yeah, but everybody loves graphs, especially technically clueless politicos and bureaucrats... As well, graphs usually make information easier to read. The supplied data did have graphs as well. Here is one:
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
|
|
 GuspazGuspazPremium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
kudos:16 | These graphs, of course, show that their estimated cell loss is a percentage too low to calculate on most calculators. Seriously, they move enormous amounts of data (a single GigE could push 20TB in a day, their network pushes a lot more than a gigabit per second), ATM cells have a 48-byte payload, so if we consider that they must be pushing around hundreds of terabytes per day, we're looking at multiple trillions of cells per day.
Losing 4500 cells out of trillions is unbelievably low. |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
I must have missed those when I glanced over the document... |
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to Guspaz
I was thinking that myself...
Home> wan ad perf
near-end FEC error fast: 0
near-end FEC error interleaved: 0
near-end CRC error fast: 50262
near-end CRC error interleaved: 0
near-end HEC error fast: 10465
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
