site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
331
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


dnoyeB
Ferrous Phallus

join:2000-10-09
Southfield, MI

CRTC's fault

If I were to ask for proof and be given something which purports to be proof but is in fact not... I would not ask again. That is what you submitted as proof and thus you have submitted no proof. Case closed.
--
dnoyeB
"Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes 9:16


a333
A hot cup of integrals please

join:2007-06-12
Rego Park, NY
Reviews:
·Cingular Wireless

ISP's like TekSavvy are paying for their own bandwidth here, so what am I missing? As far as I know, they only purchase the last mile and the GigE's to their own POP's, to backhaul the data. Where's the congestion here?
With cable, there IS a point in throttling, as both indie ISP's and cableco subs share the same physical cable loop, and can both equally help deteriorate the traffic flow during peak hrs. But that argument is moot in the telco's case...


psydfx

join:2002-12-20
Canada

They use their own backbone but share the same BAS, aggregators and DSLAMs as all of Bell's customers and wholesale providers. So congestion on the backbone isn't a valid claim when throttling the wholesalers but the other congestion spots still play a part.
--
the opinions expressed herein are my own and do not represent my employer in any way


Thursday, 31-May 02:08:31 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics