<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Thank Verizon in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20701276</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:13:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:13:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Thank Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20701281</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1514516"><b>Dogfather</b></A> : LOL.  Yeah, FiOS sucks...that's why I now get 50/20 service that cable has no hope of offering.<br><br>Verizon just uppped their tiers to 10/2, 20/5, 20/20 and 50/20.  They're getting FASTER, not slower.<br><br>They're kicking cable's ass and DSLR reviews here have both U-Verse and FiOS smoking cable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20701281</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:12:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Thank Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20701276</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1514516"><b>Dogfather</b></A> : It depends on what you consider beating DSL's pants.<br><br>In terms of new ads, DSL's cheap prices and slower speeds, smoked cable's higher prices and faster speeds.<br><br>Billions in video revenues is a good motivation to deploy fiber and telcos couldn't do any video without rebuilding their network.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20701276</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:10:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Thank Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20700677</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/966879"><b>CCNnorthcali</b></A> : Most would not agree with you based on reviews here at DSLR.  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20700677</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:50:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Thank Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20699501</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Verizon is a terrible HSI and Television provider. FiOS is a terrible technology and it is clearly showing its age quickly. FiOS was great when it launched but since then, the speeds have started to slow. If it wasn't for Cable MSOs and their contractual obligations to cities and/or counties plus added government regulation, then there would be no competition to telephony providers such as Verizon. Cable MSOs are the reason companies such as Verizon had to clean up their game and install FiOS.<br><br>Remember that silly tax by ISPs to gain revenue to build FTTH for all users? Instead Verizon pocketed the money and built a less reliable and proprietary technology.<br><br>Thats all I have to say... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20699501</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:38:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Thank Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20700191</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/381635"><b>needforspeed59</b></A> : What I meant is, I think cable was beating DSL's pants off, so Verizon does to the mats with FIOS causing cable to fight back with DOCSIS 3.0. It works both ways. Do you think Verizon would be investing billions in fiber if cable wasn't competing? There would be no motivation. <br><small>--<br>Great success! High five!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20700191</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:03:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Thank Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20700026</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1514516"><b>Dogfather</b></A> : Hardly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20700026</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:28:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Thank Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20700016</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/381635"><b>needforspeed59</b></A> : Let me re-phrase that; without cable, Verizon would be sitting on their hands. Competition breeds competition in both directions. <br><small>--<br>Great success! High five!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20700016</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:26:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thank Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20699255</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1514516"><b>Dogfather</b></A> : For without Verizon, these cable operators would still be sitting on their hands.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20699255</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:34:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
