<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Non-Roman alphabet domain names side effect in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20702791</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:21:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:21:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Non-Roman alphabet domain names side effect</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20706218</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  wifi4milez <A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>You are correct. China could purchase the {insert Chinese character} domain, and then limit all internal (ie. people in China) users to just that domain. They will then be able to very tightly control what people are doing, as their "firewall" would simply prohibit traffic going to any other domain. <br> </div>Yep, if you don't know the language and don't have a properly configured computer, its impossible to access those domains now. Think of the possibilities if you mix cyrillic &#1089;h&#1072;r&#1072;&#1089;t&#1077;r&#1109; w&#1110;th l&#1072;t&#1110;n &#1089;h&#1072;r&#1072;&#1089;t&#1077;r&#1109;.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20706218</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:38:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Non-Roman alphabet domain names side effect</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20703622</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/158626"><b>DataDoc</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  wifi4milez <A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>China could purchase the {insert Chinese character} domain, and then limit all internal (ie. people in China) users to just that domain. They will then be able to very tightly control what people are doing, as their "firewall" would simply prohibit traffic going to any other domain. <br> </div>Can't this simply be done with IPs now? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20703622</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:24:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Non-Roman alphabet domain names side effect</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20702908</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  voipdabbler <A HREF="/useremail/u/1352917"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>ICANN--opening up even more opportunities for online fraud.  Personally, I think they've opened up an unmanageable can of worms.  I do agree that there will be lawsuits with respect to domains with intellectual property connotations.  And I wouldn't hold my breath expecting porn sites to voluntarily choose domains connoting sex--they know that it will be too easy to filter those names.<br><br> </div>Also part of this decision is the use of non-Roman alphabet characters in domain suffixes. This is very democratic, but it will inevitably lead to a segmentation of the monolithic internet in to regions and languages. Aside from the censorship by China with their "Great Firewall" and in some other countries with national firewalls as well, this decision will actually foster the breakdown of international access to the internet as a whole.<br> </div>You are correct. China could purchase the {insert Chinese character} domain, and then limit all internal (ie. people in China) users to just that domain. They will then be able to very tightly control what people are doing, as their "firewall" would simply prohibit traffic going to any other domain. <br><small>--<br><b>If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.</b><br><b>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20702908</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:03:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Non-Roman alphabet domain names side effect</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20702791</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  voipdabbler <A HREF="/useremail/u/1352917"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>ICANN--opening up even more opportunities for online fraud.  Personally, I think they've opened up an unmanageable can of worms.  I do agree that there will be lawsuits with respect to domains with intellectual property connotations.  And I wouldn't hold my breath expecting porn sites to voluntarily choose domains connoting sex--they know that it will be too easy to filter those names.<br><br> </div>Also part of this decision is the use of non-Roman alphabet characters in domain suffixes. This is very democratic, but it will inevitably lead to a segmentation of the monolithic internet in to regions and languages. Aside from the censorship by China with their "Great Firewall" and in some other countries with national firewalls as well, this decision will actually foster the breakdown of international access to the internet as a whole.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20702791</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:40:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hmmmmmmmm</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20702726</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1352917"><b>voipdabbler</b></A> : ICANN--opening up even more opportunities for online fraud.  Personally, I think they've opened up an unmanageable can of worms.  I do agree that there will be lawsuits with respect to domains with intellectual property connotations.  And I wouldn't hold my breath expecting porn sites to voluntarily choose domains connoting sex--they know that it will be too easy to filter those names.<br><br>I don't like censorship, but maybe it's time for a national filter to be put in place if this plan is going to be implemented,  I see the net becoming even more lawless with this anything goes plan--I'd like to fire everyone at ICANN for agreeing to this stupidity.. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20702726</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:32:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
