<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Chrysler spells garbage in 14 languages. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20704364</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:32:13 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:32:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Chrysler spells garbage in 14 languages.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20704364</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Why can't Chisler....err Chryler, just make a decent vehicle ?<br><br>Back in the 80's it was the Reliant K.<br>Everything they made in those years either was the same chassis, or just looked exactly like it. They were junk on wheels.<br>In the 90's it was the "cab forward" thing with the Sebring, LHS, etc. all exactly alike. Flying turds were of higher quality.<br>Now we have the "magnum"....oooohhh.<br>There's 90 different models of it, they all look exactly alike, and are a steaming POS.<br><br>Just make a C-A-R, screw the fluff.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20704364</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:56:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
