<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Very nice... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20706801</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:25:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:25:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>What good is LTE ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20707500</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/908026"><b>PDXPLT</b></A> : ... if they put a 5 Gbit cap on it, like Verizon always does on their wireless "broadband" connections?  They should at least deploy basic DSL in those areas where it's feasible to do so.  But they're refusing to do that, in areas where they face no cable competition.  I guess they think they can charge more for wireless "broadband", and they don't want to cannibalize that business with their own DSL offering.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20707500</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:32:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Very nice...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20706801</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : I am glad to see that 50 Mbps can reach the whole FIOS base.  Now if I can only get them to cross the RI/CT border to come to my town!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20706801</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:56:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
