<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Proof? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20707064</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:29:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:29:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Proof?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20707064</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/397739"><b>fireflier</b></A> : Would Sandvine care to list these "leading" ISPs they compiled data from?  How about actual traffic stats from those ISPs?<br><br>So I'm supposed to believe the claims of a company that's selling equipment to fix a problem they say exists without direct evidence the problem really exists?  Did you guys know there's a special breed of Hippo that's purple?  It must be true because someone said it was.<br><br>Next up: Sandvine's unverifiable numbers will be quoted by "leading" ISPs as proof that P2P is eating up their network bandwidth.<br><small>--<br>Wishes: When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a meteorite hurtling to the Earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much hosed no matter what you wish for. Unless it's death by meteor.  --despair.com</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20707064</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:02:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
