<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>another link in Wireless Service Providers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20707952</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:33:01 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:33:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20789110</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1494561"><b>EMC_guy</b></A> : I am guessing that your yellow highlights are supposed to be areas of significant RF coupling in your opinion. <br><br>This board can be improved by a simple EMC audit. It is possible to route 5Ghz over long PCB traces but the signal should be confined to an inner layer with shielding above and below.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20789110</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:45:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20786305</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1219823"><b>lutful</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  trc120 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1322293"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>I included a close up so everyone can see with their own eyes.</div>I just noticed that the external antenna connector is fed by a <b>very long</b> PCB trace which goes past some very active digital parts (Ethernet PHY and transformers). IMHO this is very poor RF design practice, possibly motivated by the narrow rectangular design. :(<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/20786305?c=1327662&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMDcwNzk1Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="59234 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=191 SRC="/r0/download/1327662.thumb600~679f5c772ed314fed78babc40fdb1a7c/ubiquiti_ns2_rf_trace.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20786305</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:05:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20782496</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1227869"><b>Stealthwave</b></A> : Other forms:<br>Ubquiti<br>Deliberants<br>Mikrotiks<br><br>new one:<br>www.wisp-forums.com<br><br>really don't post much anymore cause don't have the time, but to try and read when I can.<br><br>The reason I said they are differant is because its spoken about it on UBNT web forum.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20782496</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 22:11:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20781984</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1322293"><b>trc120</b></A> : Not strong, just misunderstanding.  I was trying to make a quick statement I thought people would understand.<br>I was wrong about not being released yet.<br>I included a close up so everyone can see with their own eyes.  The form factor may be different, but guts and specs are nearly the same.<br>Don&#146;t be so literal by my initial statement, read it and put some thought behind it.  Obviously they are physically different placed side by side.<br><br>Todd<br><small>--<br>MoWiNet.com- Maximize your Nano Station Distance</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/20781984?c=1327294&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMDcwNzk1Mi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="187240 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=398 SRC="/r0/download/1327294.thumb600~14014cb8a28171a2f1603fa8774ac510/DSC_0319.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>NS5</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20781984</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:49:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20780054</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1524922"><b>MicroWISP</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Stealthwave <A HREF="/useremail/u/1227869"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Sorry if this looks strong to fire back at, but this is why some people stopped posting here and moved onto other sites to post on.</div>Stealthwave, what other sites are there to post on?<br><small>--<br>"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt man doing it."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20780054</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:27:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20779840</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1227869"><b>Stealthwave</b></A> : trc120<br>My bad, I thought I saw it for sale somewhere<br><br>Well at least you said you was wrong. :o<br><br>I own several of of the NS2 radios and the very first one I jerked apart to see what was inside and it clearly is not the same as the Pico.<br><br>Sorry if this looks strong to fire back at, but this is why some people stopped posting here and moved onto other sites to post on.<br><br>Been waiting for the pico to come out and try. While waiting I have ordered and started playing with the Wiligear WDB500 board. It still is not as small as the pico but close. It's pretty cool so far. Sorry UBNT but get your stuff on the market and make it right!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20779840</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:27:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20773026</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1322293"><b>trc120</b></A> : My bad, I thought I saw it for sale somewhere :uhh:<br><small>--<br>MoWiNet- Maximize your Nano Station Distance</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20773026</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:23:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20771640</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464316"><b>UBNTMike</b></A> : Hey Guys,<br><br>PicoStation is a completely different form factor then NanoStation 2.  It is about the size of a credit card, and at this time is not released yet.  This should hit the market in mid-auguts.<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Mike<br>Ubiquiti Networks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20771640</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:37:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753278</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1322293"><b>trc120</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Stealthwave <A HREF="/useremail/u/1227869"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>NS2 is completely different, NS2is all built togather antenna and radio.<br><br>pico is just the radio and board with mmcx anntena port.<br> </div>Isn't that what minus antenna and enclosure means?  Take off those 2 dual polarity patch antennas and you almost have a pico. <br><br>What I meant was the specs are the same.  Same RF, processor, memory, ect.  The component part of the board is very similar.<br><br>To answer the original question pico and nano came out about the same time.<br><br>Todd<br><small>--<br>MoWiNet Maximize your Nano Station Distance</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753278</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:44:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20751122</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1227869"><b>Stealthwave</b></A> : NS2 is completely different, NS2is all built togather antenna and radio.<br><br>pico is just the radio and board with mmcx anntena port.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20751122</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:48:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20728739</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I received a call from Echotech Wireless and he told me they had filled the 2500 backordered and had 500 in stock, maybe that is only for existing customers???]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20728739</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:34:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20727786</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1104647"><b>petecarlson</b></A> : I thought the same thing till I saw the pics.  The Pico is about the size of a credit card while the NS is about 8" long with dual printed patch antennas on the back.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20727786</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:07:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20727488</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1322293"><b>trc120</b></A> : I think the picostation is basically a nano station without the enclosure or antenna, with a higher price.  It was released about the same time as the nano stations.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20727488</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:13:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20726314</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927006"><b>cpayne5</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ubnt.com/products/pico.php" >www.ubnt.com/products/pico.php</A><br><small>--<br>Hail To The Redskins</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20726314</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:21:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20726139</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1153739"><b>kewlkeed</b></A> : This is totally off topic (And god I hope it doesn't start a rumor mill)...<br><br>Somewhere I read in one of those links or something connected with this thread a day or so ago a mention of a "Picostation" was I reading an error? Nobody else seemed to jump or flinch at the mention of it so perhaps was just an error? Or is Ubnt coming out with yet another unit?<br><br>Thanks and please don't take this seriously as it could very well be rumor and nothing more.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20726139</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:51:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20725442</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1466851"><b>mtroup</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by jwcn :</small><br><br>Streakwave has 500 in stock as of 3pm today.<br> </div>I just called them and they said they have had around 2500 backordered for a few months, so I'm not sure where you got this but they told me it was definitely incorrect.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20725442</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:54:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20723100</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Streakwave has 500 in stock as of 3pm today.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20723100</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:45:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20722715</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/785616"><b>markscs</b></A> : now if only they were still in stock somewhere...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20722715</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:35:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20722634</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655955"><b>viperm</b></A> : Reminds me of Moto Canopy stuff as far as the form factor goes..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20722634</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:20:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20722457</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/959182"><b>keefe007</b></A> : How much are these?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20722457</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:42:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>another link</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20707952</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1284507"><b>Ketcham</b></A> : Found another link of same close-up pictures of NS2:<br><br>A look inside the Nanostation 2<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://metrix.net/blog/2008/04/09/10/" >metrix.net/blog/2008/04/09/10/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20707952</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:07:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20707908</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1284507"><b>Ketcham</b></A> : Close-up pictures of Nanostation 2: <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattw/2402293052/in/photostream/" >www.flickr.com/photos/mattw/2402&middot;&middot;&middot;ostream/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20707908</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:57:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
