http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20707836 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:20:21 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:20:21 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20984839 said by Dogfather:

For SoCal the RR Extreme tier has been 15/2 for $55 for a long time. I had it before switching to FiOS. And it was cheaper than Verizon's month-month price. Seems like this is a step backward.
That's what I'm on now. I might get the occasional speed degradation on Sunday, but other than that it's zip fast. Watching DownThemAll ramp to 2MB/sec on downloads without using the accelerator feature is a beautiful thing.

To the complaints about low upstream, it's obviously to discourage servers. You don't need that much upstream to download files, browse the web or read email - which is what the majority of customers are doing. A better question would be, why the severe lack of strong synchronous connections on the business side? I would expect to see 20/20 over there, but don't. Why not?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20984839 Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:45:44 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20715023
»dslextreme.com been with them for a while now, and there awesome :) ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20715023 Sun, 29 Jun 2008 02:06:45 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20714265 Nobody told me squat, so I had to play "connect the dots", and now that I got the picture, I made an appointment with AT&T for regular DSL, sixty dollars cheaper per month! Time Warner, now you can "peer" the extra bandwidth you were shorting me for, and I hope you make lots of money from it, because you lost a good customer in me! ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20714265 Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:37:26 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20708276 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20708276 Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:13:09 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20708106 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20708106 Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:35:11 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20708022
TWC needs to make some moves and really needs to standardize more. I realize that the speeds are based on the local competition, but 512Kbps is quite paltry in comparison to most upload speeds these days. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20708022 Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:18:54 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20707978
TWC must have one of the most VARIED networks among all cable companies when it comes to speed.

Most cable operators now offer a near or above 1mbps upload option. TWC can't even figure that one out. More than just pathetic if you ask me.

I would love to see what kind of effect powerboost will have on customers that TWC is slapping a pathetic 20-40 GB cap on.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20707978 Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:11:56 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20707836 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Stingy-with-the-uploads-much-20707836 Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:42:42 EDT