<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;And certainly BC isn&#x27;t alone&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/And-certainly-BC-isnt-alone-20720075</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:01:27 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:01:27 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>And certainly BC isn&#x27;t alone</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/And-certainly-BC-isnt-alone-20720075</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dogfather posted : There is nothing special about Bell Canada that wouldn't apply to other ISPs so when someone like AT&T starts boo-hooing about how their seeing a 60% increase in traffic (of course that is what happens when you have a major merger), and need to cap, you know it's bullshit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/And-certainly-BC-isnt-alone-20720075</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:37:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

